<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Compilers/IDE in Intel® ISA Extensions</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Compilers-IDE/m-p/1144665#M6412</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;May I ask - what compilers/IDE are better for AVX2 / AVX512 extensions code? What source code style is preferable - C/C++ with intrinsic? or inline assembler? Some macro assembler?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;It is real problem for me - I starts new project and the price of wrong decision might be high (i'm novice with this stuff)&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:15:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anatoly_K_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-11T13:15:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Compilers/IDE</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Compilers-IDE/m-p/1144665#M6412</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;May I ask - what compilers/IDE are better for AVX2 / AVX512 extensions code? What source code style is preferable - C/C++ with intrinsic? or inline assembler? Some macro assembler?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;It is real problem for me - I starts new project and the price of wrong decision might be high (i'm novice with this stuff)&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:15:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Compilers-IDE/m-p/1144665#M6412</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anatoly_K_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-11T13:15:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inline assembly is not</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Compilers-IDE/m-p/1144666#M6413</link>
      <description>Inline assembly is not supported by several important compiler/ide combinations so that would limit portability. The answer could depend strongly on your intended range of targets.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:57:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Compilers-IDE/m-p/1144666#M6413</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-11T17:57:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks for any comments. My</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Compilers-IDE/m-p/1144667#M6414</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any comments. My targets are i7 - i9 under Zero-OS (FreeDOS or RTDOS). I should choice development host/environment...&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:50:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Compilers-IDE/m-p/1144667#M6414</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anatoly_K_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-12T10:50:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

