<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Weird BTS Performance  in Intel® ISA Extensions</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Weird-BTS-Performance/m-p/807731#M792</link>
    <description>Perhaps you didn't tell us how your question relates to this forum.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:14:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-14T19:14:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Weird BTS Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Weird-BTS-Performance/m-p/807728#M789</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am playing around with the BTS feature and observe a very huge performance penalty. It is said in several places that this is normal. On the other hand I see academic publications that use this feature which report only a very small overhead.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Therefore, I have performed several experiments on different CPUs with different DebugCtl settings and different kind of memory caching types.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What me confuses the most is the fact that experiments with only the TR-flag enabled are *much* slower than those with TR-flag *and* BTS-flag enabled. From my understanding enabling TR+BTS does "more" than only TR, in fact writing the BTM not only to the system bus but also to the DebugStore.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Am I wrong? What is the reason for this "strange" observation?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks a lot for your help,&lt;BR /&gt;Carsten&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:25:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Weird-BTS-Performance/m-p/807728#M789</guid>
      <dc:creator>cwillems</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-10T14:25:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weird BTS Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Weird-BTS-Performance/m-p/807729#M790</link>
      <description>Branch Trace isdesigned to help tools to profile/diagnose. It can capture a lot of information, and the associated costs (delays) goes with the amount/freqency your tool ask the HW to capture. In-frequent sampling would incur smaller overhead. Doing it frequently would be like attaching a exhaust emission analyzer to the car's tail pipe, it won't be able to drive normally or normal gas mileage.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:04:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Weird-BTS-Performance/m-p/807729#M790</guid>
      <dc:creator>SHIH_K_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-10T23:04:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weird BTS Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Weird-BTS-Performance/m-p/807730#M791</link>
      <description>Thank you for your answer.&lt;BR /&gt;Unfortunately, I cannot see how it is related to my particular question.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers&lt;BR /&gt;Carsten</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:23:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Weird-BTS-Performance/m-p/807730#M791</guid>
      <dc:creator>cwillems</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-14T10:23:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weird BTS Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Weird-BTS-Performance/m-p/807731#M792</link>
      <description>Perhaps you didn't tell us how your question relates to this forum.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:14:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Weird-BTS-Performance/m-p/807731#M792</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-14T19:14:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weird BTS Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Weird-BTS-Performance/m-p/807732#M793</link>
      <description>Hi Tim,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am sorry if I have used the wrong one. I just have searched for similar requests and found some in this forum. Is their a better suited for BTM/PerformanceMonitoring-related questions?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers &amp;amp; Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;Carsten&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:56:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Weird-BTS-Performance/m-p/807732#M793</guid>
      <dc:creator>cwillems</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-15T12:56:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weird BTS Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Weird-BTS-Performance/m-p/807733#M794</link>
      <description>Can you please post your question to this forum:&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/platform-monitoring/"&gt;http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/platform-monitoring/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:23:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-ISA-Extensions/Weird-BTS-Performance/m-p/807733#M794</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hussam_Mousa__Intel_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-30T22:23:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

