<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic x2apic on Xeon E5620 in Intel® Moderncode for Parallel Architectures</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/x2apic-on-Xeon-E5620/m-p/822735#M1278</link>
    <description>Oops... Typo in my mesage: of course I check 21st bit, as it mentioned in "Intel 64 Architecture x2APIC&lt;BR /&gt;Specification" (318148.pdf). But 0x29ee3f &amp;amp; (1 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; 21) == 0</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 06:38:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chernikov_t</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-28T06:38:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>x2apic on Xeon E5620</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/x2apic-on-Xeon-E5620/m-p/822734#M1277</link>
      <description>I have server PowerEdge R710 with two Xeon E560 CPUs on board. But when i check x2apic presence using CPUID(EAX=1) i got 0x29ee3ff value in ECX register which tells me that local x2apic functionality is not available (bit 10 is not set). This check is made right after entering into a protected mode. Is it a correct way to determine x2apic presence? Does mentioned processors have this functionality?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:13:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/x2apic-on-Xeon-E5620/m-p/822734#M1277</guid>
      <dc:creator>chernikov_t</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-27T14:13:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>x2apic on Xeon E5620</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/x2apic-on-Xeon-E5620/m-p/822735#M1278</link>
      <description>Oops... Typo in my mesage: of course I check 21st bit, as it mentioned in "Intel 64 Architecture x2APIC&lt;BR /&gt;Specification" (318148.pdf). But 0x29ee3f &amp;amp; (1 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; 21) == 0</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 06:38:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/x2apic-on-Xeon-E5620/m-p/822735#M1278</guid>
      <dc:creator>chernikov_t</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-28T06:38:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>x2apic on Xeon E5620</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/x2apic-on-Xeon-E5620/m-p/822736#M1279</link>
      <description>It seems that Xeon 5620 CPU have strange behaviour: while cpuid tells that x2apic is not available it still report that directed EOI support is present. So all what i have to do is just check x2apic presence and do not try to enable directed EOI with disabled x2apic even if APIC version register report that directed EOI is supported.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks all :)</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:08:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/x2apic-on-Xeon-E5620/m-p/822736#M1279</guid>
      <dc:creator>chernikov_t</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-04T13:08:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

