<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic A question about scalability on Nehalem architecture in Intel® Moderncode for Parallel Architectures</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/A-question-about-scalability-on-Nehalem-architecture/m-p/773398#M147</link>
    <description>&lt;BR /&gt;Hello, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I was reading a paper about FC (flat combining) , and i came accross &lt;BR /&gt;some graphs that shows the scalability on the Nehalem architecture: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here is the paper and the graphs in it: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/research/moran.tzafrir/papers/spaa2010_flat_combining.pdf"&gt;http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/research/moran.tzafrir/papers/spaa2010_flat_combining.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As you will notice the Nehalem Intel architecture is giving a negative &lt;BR /&gt;scalability for all the Queues, but on the SPARC architecture there is &lt;BR /&gt;positive scalability.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So my question is: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Why all of the queues are giving a negative scalability on the Intel &lt;BR /&gt;Nehalem architecture ? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;They are not saying on the paper why all the queues have a negative &lt;BR /&gt;scalability .on the Intel Nehalem architecture.. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thank you. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Amine Moulay Ramdane. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 18:02:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aminer10</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-17T18:02:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>A question about scalability on Nehalem architecture</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/A-question-about-scalability-on-Nehalem-architecture/m-p/773398#M147</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;Hello, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I was reading a paper about FC (flat combining) , and i came accross &lt;BR /&gt;some graphs that shows the scalability on the Nehalem architecture: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here is the paper and the graphs in it: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/research/moran.tzafrir/papers/spaa2010_flat_combining.pdf"&gt;http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/research/moran.tzafrir/papers/spaa2010_flat_combining.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As you will notice the Nehalem Intel architecture is giving a negative &lt;BR /&gt;scalability for all the Queues, but on the SPARC architecture there is &lt;BR /&gt;positive scalability.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So my question is: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Why all of the queues are giving a negative scalability on the Intel &lt;BR /&gt;Nehalem architecture ? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;They are not saying on the paper why all the queues have a negative &lt;BR /&gt;scalability .on the Intel Nehalem architecture.. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thank you. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Amine Moulay Ramdane. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 18:02:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/A-question-about-scalability-on-Nehalem-architecture/m-p/773398#M147</guid>
      <dc:creator>aminer10</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-17T18:02:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

