https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/miss-cache/m-p/838497#M1637 Hi,<BR />i still surprised with the result that i obtained when i runned the microbenchmark to detect the L1 and L2 miss caches for double type in multiplication matrix program. The L2 miss started in at a <B>value of number of memory access</B> upper (very &gt;&gt;)than the L1 miss one. And wich is more weird is that this value of L2 miss is upper than the miss L2 value of the type integer.Is it logical to obtain this!<BR />My processor is intel core2duo cpuT7500 @2.2Ghz<BR />Please help me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<BR />Thanks a lot. Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:31:08 GMT sammoura 2010-04-15T18:31:08Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/miss-cache/m-p/838497#M1637 Hi,<BR />i still surprised with the result that i obtained when i runned the microbenchmark to detect the L1 and L2 miss caches for double type in multiplication matrix program. The L2 miss started in at a <B>value of number of memory access</B> upper (very &gt;&gt;)than the L1 miss one. And wich is more weird is that this value of L2 miss is upper than the miss L2 value of the type integer.Is it logical to obtain this!<BR />My processor is intel core2duo cpuT7500 @2.2Ghz<BR />Please help me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<BR />Thanks a lot. Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:31:08 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/miss-cache/m-p/838497#M1637 sammoura 2010-04-15T18:31:08Z