<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hyperthreading in dual-dual processor in Intel® Moderncode for Parallel Architectures</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Hyperthreading-in-dual-dual-processor/m-p/871604#M2955</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am running an extreemly CPU intensive multi-body simulation which lend itself nicely to parallel processing. We have run several tests with the same simulation using a single-threaded compilation and a multi-threaded compilation. We have run the same simulation with the hyper-threading on and off. Here are the results:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The 12-body simulation on the dual-dual core Xeon machine runs about 70% faster when using the multi-threaded compilation compared to the single-threaded compilarion.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When we turn hyper-threading on, the execution of the multi-threaded compilation slows down about 15%. In this CPU intensive simulation, the 8 processor threads fight for CPU time and only average about 50% CPU time for each hyper-thread. With the hyper-threading off, the same simulation uses all four CPUs at almost 100% throughout the simulation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So, we are are turning hyper-threading off because most of our processor time is spent running these CPU intensive simulations.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:45:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mattsdad</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-04-05T17:45:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hyperthreading in dual-dual processor</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Hyperthreading-in-dual-dual-processor/m-p/871604#M2955</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am running an extreemly CPU intensive multi-body simulation which lend itself nicely to parallel processing. We have run several tests with the same simulation using a single-threaded compilation and a multi-threaded compilation. We have run the same simulation with the hyper-threading on and off. Here are the results:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The 12-body simulation on the dual-dual core Xeon machine runs about 70% faster when using the multi-threaded compilation compared to the single-threaded compilarion.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When we turn hyper-threading on, the execution of the multi-threaded compilation slows down about 15%. In this CPU intensive simulation, the 8 processor threads fight for CPU time and only average about 50% CPU time for each hyper-thread. With the hyper-threading off, the same simulation uses all four CPUs at almost 100% throughout the simulation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So, we are are turning hyper-threading off because most of our processor time is spent running these CPU intensive simulations.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:45:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Hyperthreading-in-dual-dual-processor/m-p/871604#M2955</guid>
      <dc:creator>mattsdad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-05T17:45:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hyperthreading in dual-dual processor</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Hyperthreading-in-dual-dual-processor/m-p/871605#M2956</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Memory contention seems a more likely reason for low CPU utilization with increased number of threads. Several factors could be involved, including which OS you use.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 18:56:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Hyperthreading-in-dual-dual-processor/m-p/871605#M2956</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-05T18:56:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hyperthreading in dual-dual processor</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Hyperthreading-in-dual-dual-processor/m-p/871606#M2957</link>
      <description>There is no question or problem here. I was only providing the data so others could use this data point in their evaluations. Maybe encourage checking the speed with and without hyper-threading for their own programs.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 17:06:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Hyperthreading-in-dual-dual-processor/m-p/871606#M2957</guid>
      <dc:creator>mattsdad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-09T17:06:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

