<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thread Checker and shared locks? in Intel® Moderncode for Parallel Architectures</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Thread-Checker-and-shared-locks/m-p/874451#M3124</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'll look into VTune.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are you suggesting that Thread Checker alone cannot do what I want through its API? That would be unfortunate since shared locks are common. pThreads has them, but we're rolling our own mutex locks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:38:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ronmak</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-03-11T00:38:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Thread Checker and shared locks?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Thread-Checker-and-shared-locks/m-p/874449#M3122</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there support for shared (read) locks in the user-level synchronization API? I'm developing a Linux application where we do our own non-pThread and non-OpenMP mutexes. The four methods __itt_notify_sync_{prepare, cancel, acquired, releasing} appear to support only exclusive (write) locks. Am I missing something?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:19:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Thread-Checker-and-shared-locks/m-p/874449#M3122</guid>
      <dc:creator>ronmak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-09T00:19:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread Checker and shared locks?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Thread-Checker-and-shared-locks/m-p/874450#M3123</link>
      <description>What you're missing is that expert advice on VTune and Thread Checker should be more readily available on the VTune forum.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:48:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Thread-Checker-and-shared-locks/m-p/874450#M3123</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-09T13:48:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread Checker and shared locks?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Thread-Checker-and-shared-locks/m-p/874451#M3124</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'll look into VTune.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are you suggesting that Thread Checker alone cannot do what I want through its API? That would be unfortunate since shared locks are common. pThreads has them, but we're rolling our own mutex locks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:38:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Thread-Checker-and-shared-locks/m-p/874451#M3124</guid>
      <dc:creator>ronmak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-11T00:38:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread Checker and shared locks?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Thread-Checker-and-shared-locks/m-p/874452#M3125</link>
      <description>No, only that few experts on Thread Checker read this forum regularly.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:19:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Thread-Checker-and-shared-locks/m-p/874452#M3125</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-11T05:19:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

