<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Parallelization question about 4 quad core systems vs eight dual core systems in Intel® Moderncode for Parallel Architectures</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Parallelization-question-about-4-quad-core-systems-vs-eight-dual/m-p/893769#M3910</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is it possible that each and every application can be parallelizedto utilize the power of all the cores available in the socket? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Does a single application running on four CPU - quad core (4 cpu X 4 cores) and Eight CPU - Dual cores (8 X 2) servers give the same performance? If not, which is better if the same application is fully parallelized based on the multi-processor i.e SMP aytem (not on multicore)?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Your answermay help me in choosing the best option for my company.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:09:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>postaquestion</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-03T00:09:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Parallelization question about 4 quad core systems vs eight dual core systems</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Parallelization-question-about-4-quad-core-systems-vs-eight-dual/m-p/893769#M3910</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is it possible that each and every application can be parallelizedto utilize the power of all the cores available in the socket? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Does a single application running on four CPU - quad core (4 cpu X 4 cores) and Eight CPU - Dual cores (8 X 2) servers give the same performance? If not, which is better if the same application is fully parallelized based on the multi-processor i.e SMP aytem (not on multicore)?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Your answermay help me in choosing the best option for my company.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:09:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Parallelization-question-about-4-quad-core-systems-vs-eight-dual/m-p/893769#M3910</guid>
      <dc:creator>postaquestion</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-03T00:09:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Parallelization question about 4 quad core systems vs eight</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Parallelization-question-about-4-quad-core-systems-vs-eight-dual/m-p/893770#M3911</link>
      <description>There certainly is no blanket answer for this question. It would depend on specific applications and computer models under consideration. Among the comparisons we are called upon to make, 2 nodes of Harpertown 1600FSB dual socket quad core will not give the performance of 4 nodes Wolfdale dual socket dual core, but the more competitively priced examples of that Harpertown will give better performance per dollar and per watt on a majority of applications. It is very possible that a similar comparison would hold between 4 socket quad core and 8 socket dual core, if you have an application for which both are suited (more performance on the 8 socket machine, at a bigger increase in cost). Applications which make even moderate demands on memory bandwidth aren't likely to give competitive performance per dollar or watt on current 4 or 8 socket servers, if they are suitable for running on a cluster of multiple single or dual socket servers. You may have noticed that the Intel EP "efficient performance" models are dual socket. A year from now, 4 and 8 socket models should show a very big increase in performance, even more than 1 and 2 socket models. 8 socket models will still be somewhat specialized, with differing configurations for various purposes, and the 4 and 8 socket machines will continue to support lower bus and CPU clock frequencies than 2 sockets.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:49:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Parallelization-question-about-4-quad-core-systems-vs-eight-dual/m-p/893770#M3911</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-03T03:49:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

