<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic How does Intel MPI handle network failures in Intel® Moderncode for Parallel Architectures</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/How-does-Intel-MPI-handle-network-failures/m-p/902007#M4276</link>
    <description>Hi all, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am new to the forum and have a question regarding network failures and MPI applications (specifically using the Intel MPI binding).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What happens if I have a a number of processes running on a cluster, and someone unplugs a network cable? As far as I have read, the MPI processes gets terminated immediately. How can I circumvent this, say by using some sort of a WAIT or TIMEOUT command if a network fault is detected, so that they can see if maybe they can again recover after a number of (set) seconds?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any help would be very much appreciated!</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:27:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dludick</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-10-26T15:27:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How does Intel MPI handle network failures</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/How-does-Intel-MPI-handle-network-failures/m-p/902007#M4276</link>
      <description>Hi all, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am new to the forum and have a question regarding network failures and MPI applications (specifically using the Intel MPI binding).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What happens if I have a a number of processes running on a cluster, and someone unplugs a network cable? As far as I have read, the MPI processes gets terminated immediately. How can I circumvent this, say by using some sort of a WAIT or TIMEOUT command if a network fault is detected, so that they can see if maybe they can again recover after a number of (set) seconds?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any help would be very much appreciated!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:27:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/How-does-Intel-MPI-handle-network-failures/m-p/902007#M4276</guid>
      <dc:creator>dludick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-26T15:27:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How does Intel MPI handle network failures</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/How-does-Intel-MPI-handle-network-failures/m-p/902008#M4277</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin: 0px; height: auto;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
This question is probably too involved to handle on this section of the forums. I believe built-in checkpoint capability for Intel MPI is under consideration but would be more than a year away. Many applications have their own recovery options. You might ask on the HPC forum, if any additional fault tolerance features are expected in the near term.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:30:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/How-does-Intel-MPI-handle-network-failures/m-p/902008#M4277</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-26T16:30:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

