<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Statically linked TBB in Commerical? in Intel® Moderncode for Parallel Architectures</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Statically-linked-TBB-in-Commerical/m-p/902711#M4291</link>
    <description>Hi, I am currently testing out OSSTBB and mucho kudos for this package. It is very nice. Little documentation/sample code, but very nice! &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am thinking about integrating it with our product line vs some other packages. We ship a single dll. We don't want to open up the GPL can of worms but want to use the threading library. I noticed this thread:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums//topic/55589" target="_blank"&gt;http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums//topic/55589&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So we attempted to integrate (as a test) the code into our DLL just fine so I know it's not a technical impossibility. So to the question: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Does the commerical package support statically linking TBB into a DLL? (I mean granted, we jump through some hoops, would it be possible? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the help!&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:44:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ndepalma</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-11T16:44:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Statically linked TBB in Commerical?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Statically-linked-TBB-in-Commerical/m-p/902711#M4291</link>
      <description>Hi, I am currently testing out OSSTBB and mucho kudos for this package. It is very nice. Little documentation/sample code, but very nice! &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am thinking about integrating it with our product line vs some other packages. We ship a single dll. We don't want to open up the GPL can of worms but want to use the threading library. I noticed this thread:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums//topic/55589" target="_blank"&gt;http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums//topic/55589&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So we attempted to integrate (as a test) the code into our DLL just fine so I know it's not a technical impossibility. So to the question: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Does the commerical package support statically linking TBB into a DLL? (I mean granted, we jump through some hoops, would it be possible? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the help!&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:44:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Statically-linked-TBB-in-Commerical/m-p/902711#M4291</guid>
      <dc:creator>ndepalma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-11T16:44:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Statically linked TBB in Commerical?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Statically-linked-TBB-in-Commerical/m-p/902712#M4292</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin: 0px; height: auto;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
No, the commercial version of TBB does not provide statically linkable libraries, for the reasons explained in the forum thread you referenced, and also in &lt;A href="http://www.threadingbuildingblocks.org/wiki/index.php?title=Using_TBB#Is_there_a_version_of_TBB_that_provides_statically_linked_libraries.3F"&gt;this FAQ answer&lt;/A&gt;.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:49:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Statically-linked-TBB-in-Commerical/m-p/902712#M4292</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alexey-Kukanov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-12T11:49:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

