<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hardware Based Security Mainframe in Intel® Moderncode for Parallel Architectures</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Hardware-Based-Security-Mainframe/m-p/952317#M5203</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Hey folks, got a question.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Given we operate true multi-core processers and actually use them to run two different systems, one secure and one public (intranet/internet). Is it possible to then actually dumb the operations made on the two systems into a third system with Linux/MS Systen running on it, and make it appear as if we operatein windows. ? Like we integrate switching/routing into the actual single multi-core system and operate on the two base systems, using hardwareswitches, and mirror the action into windows. This way, I am citing a friend of mine, since I am not too much into this, we could coordinate processing and file-movement behind the actual operation system without having the risk of the system writing backwards on the systems operating it. I mean, is there something such as this and yea, is it secure?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;thx.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Ben&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Message Edited by bscherer@uni-bonn.de on &lt;SPAN class="date_text"&gt;01-08-2006&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="time_text"&gt;03:25 PM&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:21:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bscherer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-01-09T07:21:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hardware Based Security Mainframe</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Hardware-Based-Security-Mainframe/m-p/952317#M5203</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Hey folks, got a question.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Given we operate true multi-core processers and actually use them to run two different systems, one secure and one public (intranet/internet). Is it possible to then actually dumb the operations made on the two systems into a third system with Linux/MS Systen running on it, and make it appear as if we operatein windows. ? Like we integrate switching/routing into the actual single multi-core system and operate on the two base systems, using hardwareswitches, and mirror the action into windows. This way, I am citing a friend of mine, since I am not too much into this, we could coordinate processing and file-movement behind the actual operation system without having the risk of the system writing backwards on the systems operating it. I mean, is there something such as this and yea, is it secure?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;thx.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Ben&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Message Edited by bscherer@uni-bonn.de on &lt;SPAN class="date_text"&gt;01-08-2006&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="time_text"&gt;03:25 PM&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:21:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Hardware-Based-Security-Mainframe/m-p/952317#M5203</guid>
      <dc:creator>bscherer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-09T07:21:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

