<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic I can think of no downside or in Intel® Moderncode for Parallel Architectures</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Compiling-OpenMP-Fortran-programs/m-p/988857#M5976</link>
    <description>I can think of no downside or difference for the code generated for the routine. Be mindful that should the -openmp option reach (be passed through to) the link phase that the OpenMP libraries may be linked in. I assume that your "doesn't have any OpenMP directives" also includes "doesn't call OpenMP library functions" as well.

Jim Dempsey</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:02:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jimdempseyatthecove</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-03T14:02:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Compiling OpenMP Fortran programs</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Compiling-OpenMP-Fortran-programs/m-p/988856#M5975</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Suppose I have a FORTRAN file that doesn't have any OpenMP directives, but as a routine that will be called from within OpenMP&amp;nbsp;parallel region.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If is there any difference in compiling the following file with one of these options:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-openmp&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-recursive&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-auto&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If there is a difference, is there any downside to using these in combination (it simplifies some Makefiles).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--rr&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:30:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Compiling-OpenMP-Fortran-programs/m-p/988856#M5975</guid>
      <dc:creator>Raghu_Reddy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-03T11:30:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I can think of no downside or</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Compiling-OpenMP-Fortran-programs/m-p/988857#M5976</link>
      <description>I can think of no downside or difference for the code generated for the routine. Be mindful that should the -openmp option reach (be passed through to) the link phase that the OpenMP libraries may be linked in. I assume that your "doesn't have any OpenMP directives" also includes "doesn't call OpenMP library functions" as well.

Jim Dempsey</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:02:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Compiling-OpenMP-Fortran-programs/m-p/988857#M5976</guid>
      <dc:creator>jimdempseyatthecove</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-03T14:02:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In addition to what Jim said,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Compiling-OpenMP-Fortran-programs/m-p/988858#M5977</link>
      <description>In addition to what Jim said, declaring the procedure RECURSIVE will make it callable in a parallel region, without depending on those options.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 15:23:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Compiling-OpenMP-Fortran-programs/m-p/988858#M5977</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-03T15:23:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

