<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Architecture in Intel. in Intel® Moderncode for Parallel Architectures</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Architecture-in-Intel/m-p/1008279#M6483</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What does x in x86 signify? Is it a set of architectures?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:16:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mudit_Sharma</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-13T14:16:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Architecture in Intel.</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Architecture-in-Intel/m-p/1008279#M6483</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What does x in x86 signify? Is it a set of architectures?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:16:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Architecture-in-Intel/m-p/1008279#M6483</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mudit_Sharma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T14:16:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The x86 term became common</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Architecture-in-Intel/m-p/1008280#M6484</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The&amp;nbsp;x86 term became common after the introduction of the 80386, it usually implies a binary compatibility with the 32-bit instruction set of the 80386. This may sometimes be emphasized as x86-32 to distinguish it either from the original 16-bit x86-16 or from the newer 64-bit x86-64 (also called x64). Although most x86-processors used in personal computers and servers have 64-bit capabilities, to avoid compatibility problems with older computers or systems, the term x86-64 is often used to denote 64-bit software, with the term x86 implying only 32-bit.&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Architecture-in-Intel/m-p/1008280#M6484</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeP_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T17:29:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A non-Intel historical</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Architecture-in-Intel/m-p/1008281#M6485</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A non-Intel historical perspective:&amp;nbsp; The follow-ons to the Intel 8086 processor included the 80186, 80286, 80386, and 80486.&amp;nbsp; It was convenient to refer to the common underlying architecture as 80x86, which was then abbreviated to "x86".&amp;nbsp; This is commonly used, but is not particularly precise since it includes both 16-bit processors (80186 &amp;amp; 80286) and 32-bit processors (80386 &amp;amp; 80486).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Still, it has proven a useful shorthand since few people care about the older 16-bit processors.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Intel's official name for the 32-bit architecture starting with the 80386 processors is "IA-32", and is still used to cover the 32-bit mode of operation of the current chips.&amp;nbsp; Clearly, "IA-32" is not a good name for the 64-bit processors that came more recently, but "IA-64" was already in use for the architecture of the Itanium processor family.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AMD (under license from Intel) developed a 64-bit architecture by extending the IA-32 architecture, calling this "AMD64" -- also a name that would not work well for Intel!&amp;nbsp; The AMD64 architecture was also referred to as the "x86-64" (based on the "x86" abbreviation discussed above) or sometimes "x64" architecture.&amp;nbsp; Intel initially called their 64-bit implementation "EM64T", but later changed to referring to this as the "Intel 64" architecture.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Intel's software developer's manuals mention both "Intel 64" and "IA-32" in the titles, as most Intel processors continue to support both architectures.&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Architecture-in-Intel/m-p/1008281#M6485</guid>
      <dc:creator>McCalpinJohn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-15T16:53:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

