<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Is your application multi in Intel® Moderncode for Parallel Architectures</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/How-to-make-a-general-return-from-the-code-without-stop/m-p/1089192#M7233</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is your application multi-threaded?&lt;BR /&gt;
	Does your code reside in a DLL (or shared library)?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The cleanest way is for all (most) of your subroutines and functions return a status. You define&amp;nbsp;the status values, and then if any CALL/function returns an error status, you propagate it up the returns.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Lahey has a Fortran for .NET that supports: try/catch/finally/throw&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Modifying your code for that, is on the order of modifying your code to pass a STATUS variable.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Jim Dempsey&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 22:24:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jimdempseyatthecove</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-02-06T22:24:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to make a general return from the code without stop</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/How-to-make-a-general-return-from-the-code-without-stop/m-p/1089191#M7232</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hallo all experts,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;for my code written in fortran also the web-service is developed. The problem is that any stop-command (if error appears) kills the web-service. What I need now is to replace all my "stops" by the fortran-command which makes exit (say, with flag), but not terminates the head-subroutine. I believe that the command like that is already exists. Otherwise, I'm forced to write the set of the commands for returning to the head-subroutine. The point of such return is not clear.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;With thanks,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Mykola.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 16:44:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/How-to-make-a-general-return-from-the-code-without-stop/m-p/1089191#M7232</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mykola_M_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-06T16:44:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is your application multi</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/How-to-make-a-general-return-from-the-code-without-stop/m-p/1089192#M7233</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is your application multi-threaded?&lt;BR /&gt;
	Does your code reside in a DLL (or shared library)?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The cleanest way is for all (most) of your subroutines and functions return a status. You define&amp;nbsp;the status values, and then if any CALL/function returns an error status, you propagate it up the returns.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Lahey has a Fortran for .NET that supports: try/catch/finally/throw&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Modifying your code for that, is on the order of modifying your code to pass a STATUS variable.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Jim Dempsey&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 22:24:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/How-to-make-a-general-return-from-the-code-without-stop/m-p/1089192#M7233</guid>
      <dc:creator>jimdempseyatthecove</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-06T22:24:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

