<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hyperthreading &amp;amp; False Sharing in Intel® Moderncode for Parallel Architectures</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Hyperthreading-amp-False-Sharing/m-p/1660997#M8219</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I couldn't find any concrete reference so I've decided to ask my question here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the case of a physical core composed of 2 threads with hyperthreading and the core containing an L1 cache shared for the 2 threads, could we face false sharing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's not clear to me if false sharing would still be a thing because a cache line is "owned" by one or the other thread, or if conversely, false sharing wouldn't apply because a cache line would already be in the same L1 cache.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope my question is clear.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 23:21:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bclark</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-27T23:21:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hyperthreading &amp; False Sharing</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Hyperthreading-amp-False-Sharing/m-p/1660997#M8219</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I couldn't find any concrete reference so I've decided to ask my question here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the case of a physical core composed of 2 threads with hyperthreading and the core containing an L1 cache shared for the 2 threads, could we face false sharing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's not clear to me if false sharing would still be a thing because a cache line is "owned" by one or the other thread, or if conversely, false sharing wouldn't apply because a cache line would already be in the same L1 cache.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope my question is clear.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 23:21:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Moderncode-for-Parallel/Hyperthreading-amp-False-Sharing/m-p/1660997#M8219</guid>
      <dc:creator>bclark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-27T23:21:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

