<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic If you're trying to get by in Intel® MPI Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Building-a-small-cluster/m-p/995651#M3643</link>
    <description>If you're trying to get by with 1GbE, the smaller number of more powerful nodes should be successful on a wider variety of applications.  10GbE has good bandwidth for very large messages, but typically doesn't improve latency as Infiniband would do.
I haven't heard of anyone trying multi-rail or the like with 1GbE, as the opportunities for it to be cost effective look limited.  The main use of dual port adaptors is to support a local network exclusively for your cluster, keeping communication outside the cluster on the other ports.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:38:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-11T13:38:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Building a small cluster</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Building-a-small-cluster/m-p/995650#M3642</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I need help deciding between the following two cluster designs for HPC puposes:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4x Nodes with 2x Intel Xeon E5-2450 2.20GHz, 20M Cache, 8.0GT/s QPI, Turbo, 8C, 95W&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;16 - 20x Nodes with&amp;nbsp;Intel Xeon E3-1230v2 Processor 3.3GHz, 4C/8T, 8M Cache, 69W&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The interconnect I don't know yet, but I don't think I will be able to afford 10GbE, so I am wondering if normal 1GbE will be suppose and if link aggregation will provide better performance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 23:34:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Building-a-small-cluster/m-p/995650#M3642</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen_K_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-02T23:34:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If you're trying to get by</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Building-a-small-cluster/m-p/995651#M3643</link>
      <description>If you're trying to get by with 1GbE, the smaller number of more powerful nodes should be successful on a wider variety of applications.  10GbE has good bandwidth for very large messages, but typically doesn't improve latency as Infiniband would do.
I haven't heard of anyone trying multi-rail or the like with 1GbE, as the opportunities for it to be cost effective look limited.  The main use of dual port adaptors is to support a local network exclusively for your cluster, keeping communication outside the cluster on the other ports.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:38:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Building-a-small-cluster/m-p/995651#M3643</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-11T13:38:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

