<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic I'll check with our in Intel® MPI Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Intel-Micro-Benchmark-Result-Problem-with-PCI-passthrough-via/m-p/1024070#M4091</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'll check with our developers and see if they have any ideas.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 18:13:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>James_T_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-05-29T18:13:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Intel Micro Benchmark Result Problem with PCI-passthrough via FDR infiniband</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Intel-Micro-Benchmark-Result-Problem-with-PCI-passthrough-via/m-p/1024069#M4090</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone, I still evaluate cluster performance. For now, i move on virtualization with PCI-passthrough via FDR infiniband on KVM hypervisor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My problem is Sendrecv throughput that decrease by half when compare with physical machine and i use 1 rank/node. For example&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Node &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Bare-metal (MB/s) &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; PCI-passthrough (MB/s)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 2 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;14,600 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;13,000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;4 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 14,500 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;12,000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 16 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;14,300 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;11,000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 32 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;14,290 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;10,000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 64 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;14,200 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 7,100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do you think about this behavior ? Is it about mellanox software or other things or overhead ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cartridge Carl&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 06:08:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Intel-Micro-Benchmark-Result-Problem-with-PCI-passthrough-via/m-p/1024069#M4090</guid>
      <dc:creator>phonlawat_k_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-27T06:08:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I'll check with our</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Intel-Micro-Benchmark-Result-Problem-with-PCI-passthrough-via/m-p/1024070#M4091</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'll check with our developers and see if they have any ideas.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 18:13:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Intel-Micro-Benchmark-Result-Problem-with-PCI-passthrough-via/m-p/1024070#M4091</guid>
      <dc:creator>James_T_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-29T18:13:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What fabric are you using? </title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Intel-Micro-Benchmark-Result-Problem-with-PCI-passthrough-via/m-p/1024071#M4092</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What fabric are you using?&amp;nbsp; Can you attach output with I_MPI_DEBUG=5?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 18:14:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Intel-Micro-Benchmark-Result-Problem-with-PCI-passthrough-via/m-p/1024071#M4092</guid>
      <dc:creator>James_T_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-29T18:14:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I use openmpi so this is one</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Intel-Micro-Benchmark-Result-Problem-with-PCI-passthrough-via/m-p/1024072#M4093</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I use openmpi so this is one reason for this problem which i cannot attatch output with I_MPI_DEBUG=5. Anyway i use &lt;SPAN style="font-family: NimbusRomNo9L; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;Mellanox ConnectX-3 FDR Infiniband HCA (56 Gbps)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2014 10:52:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Intel-Micro-Benchmark-Result-Problem-with-PCI-passthrough-via/m-p/1024072#M4093</guid>
      <dc:creator>phonlawat_k_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-21T10:52:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

