<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic I have run IMB both with mpd in Intel® MPI Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/mpi-performance-settings-issue/m-p/1051272#M4410</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi James,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks for replying me.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I have run IMB both with mpd and hydra, the attached txt files. i've also attached two pictures that show the cpu usage in both cases.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;To do the ubdate will take more time.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regads,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;SK&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2014 09:21:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kalen__stoi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-09-21T09:21:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>mpi performance/settings issue</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/mpi-performance-settings-issue/m-p/1051270#M4408</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;
	&lt;DIV&gt;
		&lt;DIV&gt;
			&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

			&lt;P&gt;I am using intel mpi 4.1.3 with different process managers, mpd/hydra and got very different behavior&lt;/P&gt;

			&lt;P&gt;when i use mpd (mpiexec -perhost 32 -nolocal -n 384 -env I_MPI_FABRICS shm:dapl ./wrf.exe ) i've got all 32 cores on 100% on each nodes. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
			when i use hydra (mpirun -perhost 32 -nolocal -n 384 -env I_MPI_FABRICS shm:dapl ./wrf.exe) i've got only 26 cores on 100% the rest are about 0% cpu time. and the performance decrease about two times.&lt;/DIV&gt;
		What is the explanation? how to fix this?&lt;BR /&gt;
		&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
	Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;

&lt;P&gt;SK&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:50:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/mpi-performance-settings-issue/m-p/1051270#M4408</guid>
      <dc:creator>kalen__stoi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-16T14:50:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can you run IMB under both</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/mpi-performance-settings-issue/m-p/1051271#M4409</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you run IMB under both MPD and Hydra and send the results?&amp;nbsp; Also, please compare the performance of Hydra under 4.1 Update 3 with Version 5.0 Update 1 (the most recent).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:52:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/mpi-performance-settings-issue/m-p/1051271#M4409</guid>
      <dc:creator>James_T_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-19T20:52:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I have run IMB both with mpd</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/mpi-performance-settings-issue/m-p/1051272#M4410</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi James,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks for replying me.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I have run IMB both with mpd and hydra, the attached txt files. i've also attached two pictures that show the cpu usage in both cases.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;To do the ubdate will take more time.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regads,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;SK&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2014 09:21:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/mpi-performance-settings-issue/m-p/1051272#M4410</guid>
      <dc:creator>kalen__stoi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-21T09:21:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Please run again with I_MPI</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/mpi-performance-settings-issue/m-p/1051273#M4411</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please run again with I_MPI_DEBUG=5.&amp;nbsp; Just "IMB-MPI1 PingPong" is sufficient, no need for the other tests.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Are you running under a job scheduler?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;You should be able to use -hostfile for both MPD and Hydra.&amp;nbsp; Best to keep this consistent.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 19:56:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/mpi-performance-settings-issue/m-p/1051273#M4411</guid>
      <dc:creator>James_T_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-23T19:56:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi James,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/mpi-performance-settings-issue/m-p/1051274#M4412</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi James,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;Are you running under a job scheduler? - no&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;You should be able to use -hostfile for both MPD and Hydra.&amp;nbsp; Best to keep this consistent. - it doesn't work with mpd: invalid "local" arg: -hostfile. may be i should use -machinefile instead?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;the results are attached.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;SK&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:21:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/mpi-performance-settings-issue/m-p/1051274#M4412</guid>
      <dc:creator>kalen__stoi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-24T18:21:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ok, this appears to be a</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/mpi-performance-settings-issue/m-p/1051275#M4413</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, this appears to be a pinning problem.&amp;nbsp; We have improved the pinning since 4.1 Update 3, so updating to the current version could fix this.&amp;nbsp; You can install it in your user folder to test without having to upgrade your entire cluster.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If you need to stay on 4.1 Update 3, there are some steps we can try.&amp;nbsp; First, try setting&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;[plain]I_MPI_PIN_MODE=lib[/plain]&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If this doesn't work, try setting one of the following (the first is better, as it is less specific)&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;[plain]I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=all&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=0-31[/plain]&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:40:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/mpi-performance-settings-issue/m-p/1051275#M4413</guid>
      <dc:creator>James_T_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-24T21:40:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>the last is working :)</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/mpi-performance-settings-issue/m-p/1051276#M4414</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;the last is working :)&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thx!&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;SK&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 05:17:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/mpi-performance-settings-issue/m-p/1051276#M4414</guid>
      <dc:creator>kalen__stoi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-03T05:17:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

