<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic hfi1 driver version confusion in Intel® MPI Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/hfi1-driver-version-confusion/m-p/1090015#M5033</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I previously installed IntelOPA-IFS.RHEL72-x86_64.10.1.1.0.9 to set up an Omni-Path cluster. I noticed that this version of the Omni-Path software includes hfi1-0.11.3.10.0_327.el7.x86_64-248.src.rpm and after installing, hfi1 version 0.11-162 was present on the system.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I recently upgraded to IntelOPA-IFS.RHEL72-x86_64.10.2.0.0.158 and noticed that this version does not include an hfi1 driver. After upgrading, the system loads hfi1 version 0.9-294, which is the version included with the kernel.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;What is the latest version of the hfi1 driver? From the version numbers I'd guess 0.11-162 is newer than 0.9-294. If that's the case then why does upgrading to the latest Omni-Path software result in reversion to an older driver version? Additionally it looks like a version of the hfi1 driver source code is also present here: &lt;A href="https://github.com/01org/opa-hfi1" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/01org/opa-hfi1&lt;/A&gt;, however the commit comments indicate that the latest version is 0.11-156 but the actual version string in common.h is &lt;SPAN class="pl-s"&gt;0.11-162, leading to more confusion.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Is there a reason not to use driver version 0.11-162 with the latest Omni-Path software? Assumably it would be better to use the latest version.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:51:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jason_L_2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-11-17T19:51:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>hfi1 driver version confusion</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/hfi1-driver-version-confusion/m-p/1090015#M5033</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I previously installed IntelOPA-IFS.RHEL72-x86_64.10.1.1.0.9 to set up an Omni-Path cluster. I noticed that this version of the Omni-Path software includes hfi1-0.11.3.10.0_327.el7.x86_64-248.src.rpm and after installing, hfi1 version 0.11-162 was present on the system.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I recently upgraded to IntelOPA-IFS.RHEL72-x86_64.10.2.0.0.158 and noticed that this version does not include an hfi1 driver. After upgrading, the system loads hfi1 version 0.9-294, which is the version included with the kernel.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;What is the latest version of the hfi1 driver? From the version numbers I'd guess 0.11-162 is newer than 0.9-294. If that's the case then why does upgrading to the latest Omni-Path software result in reversion to an older driver version? Additionally it looks like a version of the hfi1 driver source code is also present here: &lt;A href="https://github.com/01org/opa-hfi1" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/01org/opa-hfi1&lt;/A&gt;, however the commit comments indicate that the latest version is 0.11-156 but the actual version string in common.h is &lt;SPAN class="pl-s"&gt;0.11-162, leading to more confusion.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Is there a reason not to use driver version 0.11-162 with the latest Omni-Path software? Assumably it would be better to use the latest version.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:51:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/hfi1-driver-version-confusion/m-p/1090015#M5033</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason_L_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-17T19:51:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

