<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Update: it looks like the in Intel® MPI Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Intel-MPI-license-confusion/m-p/1131173#M5650</link>
    <description>Update: it looks like the license changed: ever since Intel MPI 2018 update 2 (from March this year), and also for update 3, it is released under the &lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/license/intel-simplified-software-license" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/license/intel-simplified-software-license&lt;/A&gt; and so the confusion is gone. With those versions, given my readings the answer to all my questions 1 to 4 is YES (as long as said researchers do not attempt to do reverse engineering, decompilation, or disassembly, etc).</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:30:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bart_O_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-14T15:30:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Intel MPI license confusion</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Intel-MPI-license-confusion/m-p/1131171#M5648</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I observed that Intel MPI is now part of the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="box-sizing: border-box;"&gt;Intel® Performance Libraries, which I can freely download via &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/performance-libraries" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/performance-libraries&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN style="box-sizing: border-box;"&gt;. However, following &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/end-user-license-agreement,&amp;nbsp;" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/end-user-license-agreement,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;;&lt;SPAN style="box-sizing: border-box;"&gt;unlike the other Performance Libraries,&amp;nbsp; it is not licensed under the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/license/intel-simplified-software-license" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/license/intel-simplified-software-license&lt;/A&gt;. I assume in most cases it would be a "Named User" license then, for the user who downloads the software. Furthermore under&amp;nbsp;https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/free-mkl&amp;nbsp;Intel MPI is not listed under "Community Licensing for Everyone", but it *is* listed under "Use as an Academic Researcher".&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;However my setting is a little different (analyst at academic HPC centre). My questions are as follows then:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;1. Can an academic supercomputer center with a license to Intel Parallel Studio XE Professional/Composer edition (so not the Cluster edition!) still download Intel MPI via&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.008px;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/performance-libraries" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/performance-libraries&lt;/A&gt; and make it available to its users (without Premier Support obviously).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.008px;"&gt;2.&amp;nbsp;Can an academic supercomputer center without any&amp;nbsp;Intel Parallel Studio XE license&amp;nbsp;still download Intel MPI via&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.008px;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/performance-libraries" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/performance-libraries&lt;/A&gt; and make it available to its users (using GCC)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;3. Can individual academic researchers (so they are registered themselves, instead of the cluster admins) download Intel MPI&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.008px; box-sizing: border-box;"&gt;via&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.008px;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/performance-libraries" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/performance-libraries&lt;/A&gt; and use it, using&amp;nbsp;Intel Parallel Studio XE Professional/Composer edition installed by cluster admins?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;4.&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.008px;"&gt;Can individual academic researchers (so they are registered themselves, instead of the cluster admins) download Intel MPI&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.008px; box-sizing: border-box;"&gt;via&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.008px;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/performance-libraries" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/performance-libraries&lt;/A&gt; and use it, using GCC on a cluster?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 13:09:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Intel-MPI-license-confusion/m-p/1131171#M5648</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bart_O_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-26T13:09:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I have a somewhat related</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Intel-MPI-license-confusion/m-p/1131172#M5649</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a somewhat related query.&amp;nbsp; I have been using the Academic Researcher license for the MPI libraries for the last couple of years, but the Academic Researcher group is no longer listed on the Intel site (e.g.&amp;nbsp;https://software.intel.com/en-us/qualify-for-free-software).&amp;nbsp; Has teh Academic Researcher license been discontinued?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:09:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Intel-MPI-license-confusion/m-p/1131172#M5649</guid>
      <dc:creator>jvandeven</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-16T13:09:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Update: it looks like the</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Intel-MPI-license-confusion/m-p/1131173#M5650</link>
      <description>Update: it looks like the license changed: ever since Intel MPI 2018 update 2 (from March this year), and also for update 3, it is released under the &lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/license/intel-simplified-software-license" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/license/intel-simplified-software-license&lt;/A&gt; and so the confusion is gone. With those versions, given my readings the answer to all my questions 1 to 4 is YES (as long as said researchers do not attempt to do reverse engineering, decompilation, or disassembly, etc).</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:30:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/Intel-MPI-license-confusion/m-p/1131173#M5650</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bart_O_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-14T15:30:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

