<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic one-sided communication in Intel MPI in Intel® MPI Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/one-sided-communication-in-Intel-MPI/m-p/801499#M821</link>
    <description>Hi M Wang,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes it does. Intel MPI Library does supported passive one-sided communication. Performance... I don't know.&lt;BR /&gt;When you call MPI_Get/Put real communication will not be started until MPI_Win_Fence is called.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards!&lt;BR /&gt; Dmitry&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:54:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dmitry_K_Intel2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-18T09:54:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>one-sided communication in Intel MPI</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/one-sided-communication-in-Intel-MPI/m-p/801498#M820</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;Does &lt;I&gt;Intel MPI&lt;/I&gt; Library support &lt;I&gt;passive target one&lt;/I&gt;-&lt;I&gt;sided communication&lt;/I&gt;? How about the perforamnce? &lt;BR /&gt;It seems the performance of &lt;I&gt;passive target &lt;/I&gt;one-sided operations implemented through MPI-2
windows is very poor. The implementation of RMA in Intel MPI is not truly
one-sided. When a process call MPI_Get/Put, the target process won't response if it is busy on its own work.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:52:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/one-sided-communication-in-Intel-MPI/m-p/801498#M820</guid>
      <dc:creator>M_Wang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-10T15:52:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>one-sided communication in Intel MPI</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/one-sided-communication-in-Intel-MPI/m-p/801499#M821</link>
      <description>Hi M Wang,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes it does. Intel MPI Library does supported passive one-sided communication. Performance... I don't know.&lt;BR /&gt;When you call MPI_Get/Put real communication will not be started until MPI_Win_Fence is called.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards!&lt;BR /&gt; Dmitry&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:54:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-MPI-Library/one-sided-communication-in-Intel-MPI/m-p/801499#M821</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dmitry_K_Intel2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-18T09:54:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

