<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic multi-thread DPOTRI??? in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/multi-thread-DPOTRI/m-p/894312#M10750</link>
    <description>Hello, &lt;BR /&gt;I see that MKL provides a multi-thread Cholesky DPOTRF, but not DPOTRI (i.e., explicit inverse using this Cholesky). This would be a big help. Are there plans to do this? Is there a better alternative for efficiently inverting a p.d. matrix?&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:05:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>finleya</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-11-08T19:05:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>multi-thread DPOTRI???</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/multi-thread-DPOTRI/m-p/894312#M10750</link>
      <description>Hello, &lt;BR /&gt;I see that MKL provides a multi-thread Cholesky DPOTRF, but not DPOTRI (i.e., explicit inverse using this Cholesky). This would be a big help. Are there plans to do this? Is there a better alternative for efficiently inverting a p.d. matrix?&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:05:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/multi-thread-DPOTRI/m-p/894312#M10750</guid>
      <dc:creator>finleya</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-08T19:05:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

