<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How good is MKL? in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/How-good-is-MKL/m-p/901243#M11273</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Tim. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regarding the use of Intel compiler, it makes sense when you say that it wouldn't make any difference if my performance critical operations are using the MKL, good to know.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With all respect,are there any users out therenot from Intel who care to give their $0.02?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Michael&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:15:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mgstauffer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-22T16:15:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How good is MKL?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/How-good-is-MKL/m-p/901241#M11271</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm researching which C math library to use for a signal processing project. I need to write optimized code from a Matlab prototype. The goal is to create a commercial project so the library must allow commercial use. This is my first time using a dedicated C math library.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What's the reputation of the MKL library? What has your experience been using it? Is it generally worth it to also use the Intel C++ compiler to get the fastest possible code? How has the support been for bugs? I'm especially concerned about support since it's a closed-source lib.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts or suggestions would be great! Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Michael&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:09:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/How-good-is-MKL/m-p/901241#M11271</guid>
      <dc:creator>mgstauffer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-17T22:09:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How good is MKL?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/How-good-is-MKL/m-p/901242#M11272</link>
      <description>You'll probably want to compare performance of several libraries, and your own or open source code for the operations important to you, at least among those which have a free trial offer. MKL has more of a Fortran than C++ orientation, consistent with the open source versions where the calling sequence is inherited from them. For some functions, you may be able to find a compiler which will perform as well for a single thread, but, if there is a threaded MKL version, it may be extremely difficult to match.&lt;BR /&gt;MKL support has been quite good; of course I could only be quiet about it if I didn't believe so, in view of my employment. In a few cases (probably not in signal processing), there is a compatibility issue, in that MKL must give the same results as open source references, even if there may be a bug in the reference source. &lt;BR /&gt;If all your performance critical operations are in the library, it won't matter whether you use Intel C++. Otherwise, the answer will be highly problem dependent, with current g++ giving full performance in more situations than MSVC++ (but of course it is awkward to use MKL with g++ on Windows, and there isn't any 64-bit g++ for Windows). There again, you have free trial options.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:17:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/How-good-is-MKL/m-p/901242#M11272</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-18T02:17:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How good is MKL?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/How-good-is-MKL/m-p/901243#M11273</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Tim. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regarding the use of Intel compiler, it makes sense when you say that it wouldn't make any difference if my performance critical operations are using the MKL, good to know.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With all respect,are there any users out therenot from Intel who care to give their $0.02?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Michael&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:15:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/How-good-is-MKL/m-p/901243#M11273</guid>
      <dc:creator>mgstauffer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-22T16:15:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

