<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Fortran F77 wrappers for MKL do they still exist? in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Fortran-F77-wrappers-for-MKL-do-they-still-exist/m-p/904390#M11533</link>
    <description>&lt;EM&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin: 0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="width: 100%; margin-top: 5px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;"&gt;uoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/../profile/388007"&gt;happyIntelCamper&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="border: 1px inset; padding: 5px; background-color: #e5e5e5; margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Do F77 includeable wrappers still exist for the the DFTI FFT routines in MKL? This&lt;BR /&gt;would be for MKL 10 and above.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
This seems more topical on MKL forum, but it does appear those include files use f2003 syntax, within the range of current ifort and gfortran support.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; In the F77 style you would do INCLUDE and in F95/F2003 you would do a USE. There are some&lt;BR /&gt;'.FI' or '.F90' files but they are either C style or F2003 style includes.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:21:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>happyIntelCamper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-08-03T13:21:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fortran F77 wrappers for MKL do they still exist?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Fortran-F77-wrappers-for-MKL-do-they-still-exist/m-p/904390#M11533</link>
      <description>&lt;EM&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin: 0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="width: 100%; margin-top: 5px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;"&gt;uoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/../profile/388007"&gt;happyIntelCamper&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="border: 1px inset; padding: 5px; background-color: #e5e5e5; margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Do F77 includeable wrappers still exist for the the DFTI FFT routines in MKL? This&lt;BR /&gt;would be for MKL 10 and above.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
This seems more topical on MKL forum, but it does appear those include files use f2003 syntax, within the range of current ifort and gfortran support.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; In the F77 style you would do INCLUDE and in F95/F2003 you would do a USE. There are some&lt;BR /&gt;'.FI' or '.F90' files but they are either C style or F2003 style includes.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:21:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Fortran-F77-wrappers-for-MKL-do-they-still-exist/m-p/904390#M11533</guid>
      <dc:creator>happyIntelCamper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-03T13:21:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fortran F77 wrappers for MKL do they still exist?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Fortran-F77-wrappers-for-MKL-do-they-still-exist/m-p/904391#M11534</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;MKL doesn't provide F77 style DFTI. However, you might consider using FFTW3 Fortran interface to MKL Fourier transforms.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Dima&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:12:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Fortran-F77-wrappers-for-MKL-do-they-still-exist/m-p/904391#M11534</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dmitry_B_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-03T14:12:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

