<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Debug vs Release differences when using optzAdd2.for from IntelSP library  in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Debug-vs-Release-differences-when-using-optzAdd2-for-from/m-p/907181#M11807</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear forum,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I found differences between the calculations resulted from optzAdd2.for from Intel Signal Processing library. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I turn on the global optimization, optimize for speed, or full optimization then the release version sometimes deviate quite significantly from the debug version. If I use local or no optimization, then the results of the debug and the release versions are the same. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have checked that the inputs to the routine optzAdd2 are the same for both release and debug. There's no memory leak problem that I can detect, everything is initialized. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there a possibility that the routine optzAdd2 can only be optimized locally ? &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are there any users who have had similar experienes with the routines from signal processing library ? &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Many thanks in advance, &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Patricia Astrid&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 17:19:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous32</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-10-06T17:19:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Debug vs Release differences when using optzAdd2.for from IntelSP library</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Debug-vs-Release-differences-when-using-optzAdd2-for-from/m-p/907181#M11807</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear forum,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I found differences between the calculations resulted from optzAdd2.for from Intel Signal Processing library. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I turn on the global optimization, optimize for speed, or full optimization then the release version sometimes deviate quite significantly from the debug version. If I use local or no optimization, then the results of the debug and the release versions are the same. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have checked that the inputs to the routine optzAdd2 are the same for both release and debug. There's no memory leak problem that I can detect, everything is initialized. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there a possibility that the routine optzAdd2 can only be optimized locally ? &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are there any users who have had similar experienes with the routines from signal processing library ? &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Many thanks in advance, &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Patricia Astrid&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 17:19:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Debug-vs-Release-differences-when-using-optzAdd2-for-from/m-p/907181#M11807</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous32</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-06T17:19:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

