<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: pdtran upgrade in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/pdtran-upgrade/m-p/909519#M12031</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;Some ourchanges were based on ideas described in the following paper: &lt;A href="http://users.cs.cf.ac.uk/David.W.Walker/LINALG/transpose95.html"&gt;http://users.cs.cf.ac.uk/David.W.Walker/LINALG/transpose95.html&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Also therearesome problem for big sizes in current implementation, for example instability of performance.&lt;BR /&gt;Try to use ITAC - Intel Trace Analyzer and Collector for obtaining data on your implementation load balance.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 05:53:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrei_Moskalev__Int</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-05-07T05:53:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>pdtran upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/pdtran-upgrade/m-p/909518#M12030</link>
      <description>In the list of upgrades to the latest release of the MKL (10.1 Update 2) it mentions&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;Fixed a load-balancing problem in the pdtran ScaLAPACK function by improving the communications&lt;BR /&gt;scheme improving performance by up to 3 times &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can anyone give me details of the changes that were made to the source code as I'd like to update my version&lt;BR /&gt;of this routine to see if it gets rid of a problem I seem to be having when I try and transpose very large matrices&lt;BR /&gt;under MPI.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Many thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Tim&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:30:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/pdtran-upgrade/m-p/909518#M12030</guid>
      <dc:creator>t_r_hopkinskent_ac_u</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-05T14:30:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pdtran upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/pdtran-upgrade/m-p/909519#M12031</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;Some ourchanges were based on ideas described in the following paper: &lt;A href="http://users.cs.cf.ac.uk/David.W.Walker/LINALG/transpose95.html"&gt;http://users.cs.cf.ac.uk/David.W.Walker/LINALG/transpose95.html&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Also therearesome problem for big sizes in current implementation, for example instability of performance.&lt;BR /&gt;Try to use ITAC - Intel Trace Analyzer and Collector for obtaining data on your implementation load balance.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 05:53:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/pdtran-upgrade/m-p/909519#M12031</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrei_Moskalev__Int</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-07T05:53:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

