<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Performance differences between MKL and IPP libraries in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Performance-differences-between-MKL-and-IPP-libraries/m-p/910485#M12115</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;There is a substantial overlap in functionality between the IPP and the MKL libraries (for example, the axpy functionality, routines to compute the sin or cos of each element in a vector etc.) Does anyone have data to indicate whether there is a significant performance difference between these libraries on similar functions? &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 06:36:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tbruegge</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-09-19T06:36:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance differences between MKL and IPP libraries</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Performance-differences-between-MKL-and-IPP-libraries/m-p/910485#M12115</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is a substantial overlap in functionality between the IPP and the MKL libraries (for example, the axpy functionality, routines to compute the sin or cos of each element in a vector etc.) Does anyone have data to indicate whether there is a significant performance difference between these libraries on similar functions? &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 06:36:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Performance-differences-between-MKL-and-IPP-libraries/m-p/910485#M12115</guid>
      <dc:creator>tbruegge</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-19T06:36:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

