<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ah yes! many many thanks! in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/FFT-with-modified-fourier-coeffitients/m-p/939475#M14380</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;ah yes! many many thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:24:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mu_k_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-20T18:24:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FFT with modified fourier coeffitients</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/FFT-with-modified-fourier-coeffitients/m-p/939469#M14374</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear MKL forum,&lt;BR /&gt;I solve such a problem. Can you help me please?&lt;BR /&gt;Lets have a function Y=∑ &lt;SUB&gt;k=−∞&lt;/SUB&gt; &lt;SUP&gt;∞&lt;/SUP&gt; iY&lt;SUB&gt;n&lt;/SUB&gt;e&lt;SUP&gt;ikπy&lt;/SUP&gt; and then I have a function which is defined as X=∑&lt;SUB&gt;k=−∞&lt;/SUB&gt; &lt;SUP&gt;∞&lt;/SUP&gt; ik&lt;SUP&gt;2&lt;/SUP&gt;Y&lt;SUB&gt;n&lt;/SUB&gt;e&lt;SUP&gt;ikπy&lt;/SUP&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know the &lt;EM&gt;Y&lt;/EM&gt;. The &lt;EM&gt;i&lt;/EM&gt; is imaginary unit.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How can I compute the &lt;EM&gt;X&lt;/EM&gt;? I think I do the FFT on &lt;EM&gt;Y&lt;/EM&gt; and obtain thus the Y&lt;SUB&gt;n&lt;/SUB&gt;, right? And then I think I will do the backward FFT of function defined as f=ik&lt;SUP&gt;2&lt;/SUP&gt;Y&lt;SUB&gt;n&lt;/SUB&gt;. But what have I do with the summation index &lt;EM&gt;k&lt;/EM&gt; here in the function &lt;EM&gt;f&lt;/EM&gt;?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It is right that FFT(ik&lt;SUP&gt;2&lt;/SUP&gt;Y&lt;SUB&gt;n&lt;/SUB&gt;)=X?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure absolutely what to do with &lt;EM&gt;k&lt;/EM&gt; when the FFT sum is summated per &lt;EM&gt;k&lt;/EM&gt;. Or can I change something in MKL FFT directly?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:07:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/FFT-with-modified-fourier-coeffitients/m-p/939469#M14374</guid>
      <dc:creator>mu_k_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-11T10:07:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi, please give me a day to</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/FFT-with-modified-fourier-coeffitients/m-p/939470#M14375</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, please give me a day to think about how to do this using MKL and/or a combination with VML and I will get back to you right away.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:55:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/FFT-with-modified-fourier-coeffitients/m-p/939470#M14375</guid>
      <dc:creator>Noah_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-11T16:55:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>many thanks for your time, I</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/FFT-with-modified-fourier-coeffitients/m-p/939471#M14376</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;many thanks for your time, I'm looking forward - this is really a problem for me...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:59:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/FFT-with-modified-fourier-coeffitients/m-p/939471#M14376</guid>
      <dc:creator>mu_k_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-11T17:59:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&gt;&gt;&gt;It is right that FFT(ik2Yn</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/FFT-with-modified-fourier-coeffitients/m-p/939472#M14377</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;It is right that FFT(ik&lt;SUP&gt;2&lt;/SUP&gt;Y&lt;SUB&gt;n&lt;/SUB&gt;)=X?&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I do not know if you will get X , but in tthis case you are doing Inverse FFT on already transformed function so you will get &amp;nbsp;Y.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/FFT-with-modified-fourier-coeffitients/m-p/939472#M14377</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-12T09:42:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi, just letting you know</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/FFT-with-modified-fourier-coeffitients/m-p/939473#M14378</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, just letting you know that I am still thinking about an elegant way to do this problem. It is turning out to be harder than I thought, and I thank you for coming up with this situation. Sorry it is taking awhile to figure out. From the first glance, I don't think we can support the&amp;nbsp;sum with k^2, it is not and FFT, but I think it still may be possible&amp;nbsp;to compute this in a different way still using MKL.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:02:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/FFT-with-modified-fourier-coeffitients/m-p/939473#M14378</guid>
      <dc:creator>Noah_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-14T23:02:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>You have Y, the Fourier</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/FFT-with-modified-fourier-coeffitients/m-p/939474#M14379</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You have&amp;nbsp;Y, the&amp;nbsp;Fourier transform of Yn.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You want to&amp;nbsp;compute X which is (or rather seems to be) the convolution of Y and some function whose Fourier transform is k2. If this is the case, then our recommendation is the following:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- take inverse Fourier of Y to obtain Yn&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- compute elementwise multiplication k2 and y (say result is tmp)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- finally compute FFT of tmp to obtain X&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MKL can do the&amp;nbsp;FFT, but the elementwise multiplication of k2 and Yn can be computed by a simple loop.&amp;nbsp;Use the O3 compiler optimization to get the best results out of that loop.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:10:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/FFT-with-modified-fourier-coeffitients/m-p/939474#M14379</guid>
      <dc:creator>Noah_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-15T22:10:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ah yes! many many thanks!</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/FFT-with-modified-fourier-coeffitients/m-p/939475#M14380</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ah yes! many many thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:24:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/FFT-with-modified-fourier-coeffitients/m-p/939475#M14380</guid>
      <dc:creator>mu_k_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-20T18:24:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

