<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MKL DFT versus FFTW3.1 in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-DFT-versus-FFTW3-1/m-p/939893#M14398</link>
    <description>It seems to me that the new version of FFTW (released this january) is faster (e.g. ~20% for 512 points complex 1d double_precision) than the MKL8.0 routines, at least on Itanium systems.&lt;BR /&gt;I just did some rough performance analysis with a code using either FFTW3.1 or MKL8.0. Does anybody have detailed data? The Intel page deals with the outdated FFTW3.0.1 only.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;cheers&lt;BR /&gt;Stefan</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:48:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Henneking__Stefan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-03-21T21:48:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MKL DFT versus FFTW3.1</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-DFT-versus-FFTW3-1/m-p/939893#M14398</link>
      <description>It seems to me that the new version of FFTW (released this january) is faster (e.g. ~20% for 512 points complex 1d double_precision) than the MKL8.0 routines, at least on Itanium systems.&lt;BR /&gt;I just did some rough performance analysis with a code using either FFTW3.1 or MKL8.0. Does anybody have detailed data? The Intel page deals with the outdated FFTW3.0.1 only.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;cheers&lt;BR /&gt;Stefan</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:48:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-DFT-versus-FFTW3-1/m-p/939893#M14398</guid>
      <dc:creator>Henneking__Stefan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-21T21:48:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MKL DFT versus FFTW3.1</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-DFT-versus-FFTW3-1/m-p/939894#M14399</link>
      <description>512-point fft? FFTW seems slower than MKL8.0:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.fftw.org/speed/Pentium4-3.60GHz-icc/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.fftw.org/speed/Pentium4-3.60GHz-icc/&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:52:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-DFT-versus-FFTW3-1/m-p/939894#M14399</guid>
      <dc:creator>ttppo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-29T22:52:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MKL DFT versus FFTW3.1</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-DFT-versus-FFTW3-1/m-p/939895#M14400</link>
      <description>My God! MKL8.0.1 is even faster than AMD Core Math Library (ACML3.0) on Opteron.&lt;BR /&gt;Opteron is so slow! So poor the float-point preformence!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.fftw.org/speed/opteron-2.2GHz-64bit/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.fftw.org/speed/opteron-2.2GHz-64bit/&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 23:02:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-DFT-versus-FFTW3-1/m-p/939895#M14400</guid>
      <dc:creator>ttppo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-29T23:02:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

