<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic performance issue about pdgesv function in scalapack in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/performance-issue-about-pdgesv-function-in-scalapack/m-p/940945#M14505</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I am suffering from a problem about&amp;nbsp;pdgesv function in scalapack(C++).I have two computing nodes,each with 16 cores.The time spent solveing the linear Equation with pdgesv in two noodes is almost fifth times larger than&amp;nbsp;running in single node using the same number of processes.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; For example,A matrix is 1165*1165,and b matrix is 1165*30000.The job on&amp;nbsp;single node with two processes&amp;nbsp;takes almost 16 seconds while the job on two nodes each with one process takes more than 70 seconds.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; I know the reason should be the communication between these two nodes,but why the gap is so big and how to narrow the gap?Could someone give me some suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 04:23:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Hongda_H_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-12-18T04:23:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>performance issue about pdgesv function in scalapack</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/performance-issue-about-pdgesv-function-in-scalapack/m-p/940945#M14505</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I am suffering from a problem about&amp;nbsp;pdgesv function in scalapack(C++).I have two computing nodes,each with 16 cores.The time spent solveing the linear Equation with pdgesv in two noodes is almost fifth times larger than&amp;nbsp;running in single node using the same number of processes.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; For example,A matrix is 1165*1165,and b matrix is 1165*30000.The job on&amp;nbsp;single node with two processes&amp;nbsp;takes almost 16 seconds while the job on two nodes each with one process takes more than 70 seconds.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; I know the reason should be the communication between these two nodes,but why the gap is so big and how to narrow the gap?Could someone give me some suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 04:23:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/performance-issue-about-pdgesv-function-in-scalapack/m-p/940945#M14505</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hongda_H_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-18T04:23:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This probably the expected</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/performance-issue-about-pdgesv-function-in-scalapack/m-p/940946#M14506</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This probably the expected gap&amp;nbsp;in the case if 100Mbit Ethernet has been used. Can you give us the test and some additional configurations for checking how it will work on our side?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/performance-issue-about-pdgesv-function-in-scalapack/m-p/940946#M14506</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gennady_F_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-19T09:45:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quote:Gennady Fedorov (Intel)</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/performance-issue-about-pdgesv-function-in-scalapack/m-p/940947#M14507</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Gennady Fedorov (Intel) wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;This probably the expected gap&amp;nbsp;in the case if 100Mbit Ethernet has been used. Can you give us the test and some additional configurations for checking how it will work on our side?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your reply!! I think I have solved this problem.I just used intelmpi instead of mpich3,then this big gap disappeard.This may be the reason that intel mkl is more suitable to intelmpi.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 02:24:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/performance-issue-about-pdgesv-function-in-scalapack/m-p/940947#M14507</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hongda_H_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-20T02:24:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

