<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ScaLAPACK functions in the MKL and Ethernet network in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/ScaLAPACK-functions-in-the-MKL-and-Ethernet-network/m-p/781275#M1478</link>
    <description>Hello,&lt;DIV&gt;depends the task size. if the task size match with RAM available on single computer then please use Lapack version of dgetrf if not then -ScaLapack.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;--Gennady&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:32:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gennady_F_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-12T12:32:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ScaLAPACK functions in the MKL and Ethernet network</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/ScaLAPACK-functions-in-the-MKL-and-Ethernet-network/m-p/781274#M1477</link>
      <description>Hello.&lt;BR /&gt;In our class there are 20 computers, Intel Core 2 Duo in each. They are interconnected by simple 100Mbit Ethernet network using one Ethernet switch and twisted-pair.&lt;BR /&gt;The question is: is it reasonable to use ScaLAPACK functions (e.g. pdgetrf) at this network and 20 computers? Or I have to use just LAPACK functions (e.g. dgetrf) at single computer?&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:23:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/ScaLAPACK-functions-in-the-MKL-and-Ethernet-network/m-p/781274#M1477</guid>
      <dc:creator>alienff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-12T12:23:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ScaLAPACK functions in the MKL and Ethernet network</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/ScaLAPACK-functions-in-the-MKL-and-Ethernet-network/m-p/781275#M1478</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;DIV&gt;depends the task size. if the task size match with RAM available on single computer then please use Lapack version of dgetrf if not then -ScaLapack.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;--Gennady&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:32:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/ScaLAPACK-functions-in-the-MKL-and-Ethernet-network/m-p/781275#M1478</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gennady_F_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-12T12:32:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ScaLAPACK functions in the MKL and Ethernet network</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/ScaLAPACK-functions-in-the-MKL-and-Ethernet-network/m-p/781276#M1479</link>
      <description>Thanks for your answer!&lt;BR /&gt;Yes, the taks's data can be stored in one RAM on single computer.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Another question - is there any solution (may be not Intel :)) that will yield some performance in such Ethernet network?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:41:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/ScaLAPACK-functions-in-the-MKL-and-Ethernet-network/m-p/781276#M1479</guid>
      <dc:creator>alienff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-12T12:41:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

