<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ifc8.0, mkl6.1 and libguide.so in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/ifc8-0-mkl6-1-and-libguide-so/m-p/953692#M15370</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;It looks like the versions of libguide.so which come with ifc 8.0 and mkl6.1 are different; the one with ifc 8.0 cannot be used for mkl6.1 since it does not have all the required routines. This is for a redhat 9.0 system where I cannot do a -static link. I can only get the code to run by setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to look first at the mkl6.1 library. Has anyone worked out the "best" strategy to this?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;N.B., in calculations on a dual-memory 3.4G P4 attempts to use more than one thread seem to be really bad, slowing down the code by 50% -- perhaps due to inconsistencies....&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2004 21:42:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>L__D__Marks</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-06-15T21:42:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ifc8.0, mkl6.1 and libguide.so</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/ifc8-0-mkl6-1-and-libguide-so/m-p/953692#M15370</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;It looks like the versions of libguide.so which come with ifc 8.0 and mkl6.1 are different; the one with ifc 8.0 cannot be used for mkl6.1 since it does not have all the required routines. This is for a redhat 9.0 system where I cannot do a -static link. I can only get the code to run by setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to look first at the mkl6.1 library. Has anyone worked out the "best" strategy to this?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;N.B., in calculations on a dual-memory 3.4G P4 attempts to use more than one thread seem to be really bad, slowing down the code by 50% -- perhaps due to inconsistencies....&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2004 21:42:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/ifc8-0-mkl6-1-and-libguide-so/m-p/953692#M15370</guid>
      <dc:creator>L__D__Marks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-06-15T21:42:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

