<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic There's no reason the 32-bit in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/compatibility/m-p/973365#M16871</link>
    <description>There's no reason the 32-bit compiler/library combination shouldn't work for you.  If you are using anything beyond the default option /Qmkl, you must consult link advisor for the 32-bit settings (64-bit OS and CPU don't make any difference other than that they enable you to use the 64-bit compiler/library combination, as most of us would do).</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:46:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-14T14:46:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>compatibility</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/compatibility/m-p/973364#M16870</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am relatively new to this product. I have been having trouble with the examples included in the VS FORTRAN for the MKL (e.g. dgerx.f90 among others). I don't know, but could my problem be that I have an i7 processor/64-bit Win7 but I am trying to use a Visual Fortran + MKL that is limited to 32 bit? The MKL just doesnt seem to work.&amp;nbsp;I checked the paths included in the library and include tabs&amp;nbsp;and they look ok (library: $(IFortInstallDir)mkl\ia32\lib), (include: $(IFortInstallDir)mkl\include).&amp;nbsp;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:18:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/compatibility/m-p/973364#M16870</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brad_D_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-14T14:18:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>There's no reason the 32-bit</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/compatibility/m-p/973365#M16871</link>
      <description>There's no reason the 32-bit compiler/library combination shouldn't work for you.  If you are using anything beyond the default option /Qmkl, you must consult link advisor for the 32-bit settings (64-bit OS and CPU don't make any difference other than that they enable you to use the 64-bit compiler/library combination, as most of us would do).</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:46:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/compatibility/m-p/973365#M16871</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-14T14:46:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Here is the command line to</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/compatibility/m-p/973366#M16872</link>
      <description>Here is the command line to build the dgerx.f90 example:&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;ifort /Qmkl dgerx.f90 common_func.f mkl_blas95.lib&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
This command worked fine for me on W7SP1X64 using the 32-bit compiler and libraries.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note that when your code calls Lapack or BLAS routines using F90 interfaces, you need to explicitly specify the respective libraries, mkl_lapack95.lib or mkl_blas95.lib, since the /Qmkl compiler option does not pull these in.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/compatibility/m-p/973366#M16872</guid>
      <dc:creator>mecej4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-14T16:42:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

