<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic OMP threading in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/OMP-threading/m-p/975589#M17054</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt; We are using only a selected few routines from Intel MKL such as dgemm, daxpy, ddot, dgemv, etc. For all the other blas/lapack routines we compile and link in the actual lapack/blas routines. My questions are as follows:&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt; (i) Is dgemm, daxpy, ddot or dgemv parallelized ?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt; (ii) Do I need to use the full suite of Intel MKL routines to take advantage of parallelism in a select few routines?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;By the way, we are using Intel MKL 7.2&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Easwaran&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:43:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>easwarv</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-09-14T21:43:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OMP threading</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/OMP-threading/m-p/975589#M17054</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt; We are using only a selected few routines from Intel MKL such as dgemm, daxpy, ddot, dgemv, etc. For all the other blas/lapack routines we compile and link in the actual lapack/blas routines. My questions are as follows:&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt; (i) Is dgemm, daxpy, ddot or dgemv parallelized ?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt; (ii) Do I need to use the full suite of Intel MKL routines to take advantage of parallelism in a select few routines?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;By the way, we are using Intel MKL 7.2&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Easwaran&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:43:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/OMP-threading/m-p/975589#M17054</guid>
      <dc:creator>easwarv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-14T21:43:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OMP threading</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/OMP-threading/m-p/975590#M17055</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Why use MKL for some functions, but not for others? I'm curious.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;DGEMM is certainly parallized. The other functions from Levels 1 and 2 of the BLAS are not parallelized.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;-Todd&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:08:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/OMP-threading/m-p/975590#M17055</guid>
      <dc:creator>Todd_R_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-14T23:08:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

