BLOCK_SIZE in vdRngLognormal

ron_sobey — Fri, 15 Apr 2005 23:56:05 GMT

I am new to using IMKL. I will be primarily using in for running numerical simulations. In trying to understand how to use MKL I was programming in an example from Sergey Maidanov's paper Monte Carlo Options Pricing Using Various Industry Library Solutions, which I got from the Intel web site. In this paper for MKL he uses a variable called BLOCK_SIZE when he sets up his call to vdRngLognormal. He doesn't doesn't give a value for BLOCK_SIZE nor does he give any explanation on how to determine what it should be. Is the value for BLOCK_SIZE that will give the best performance dependent on the machine the code is run on, or the BRNG that is called for the random numbers?

Re: BLOCK_SIZE in vdRngLognormal

Intel_C_Intel — Mon, 18 Apr 2005 05:26:23 GMT

The only reason to block is to use cache more effectively. You want a blocksize large enough that the VSL performance approaches the asymptotic performance for the function (see http://www.intel.com/software/products/mkl/data/vsl/vsl_performance_data.htm) but is not so large that there is cache thrashing. As the performance reference shows, vectors of about 1K in length give you a substantial percentage of the ultimate performance for the various random number generators. Bruce

topic Re: BLOCK_SIZE in vdRngLognormal in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library

BLOCK_SIZE in vdRngLognormal

Re: BLOCK_SIZE in vdRngLognormal