<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Incomplete factorization... in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Incomplete-factorization/m-p/1000704#M18504</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;Hello,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I am testing MKL ilu factorization. As it only works for ilu0, I provide a sparse matrix pattern that corresponds to ilu(k). One thing I observe is that the performance is getting slower when I increase the level of fills (I have compared with matlab for comparison). Is this expected ?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;For instance, I have the following results from mkl.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;level0, nnz = 9,027,150, time =&amp;nbsp;0.598093, matlab =&amp;nbsp;0.766352&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;level1, nnz =&amp;nbsp;12,816,050, time =&amp;nbsp;1.3787, matlab =&amp;nbsp;1.31876&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;level2, nnz = 15,450,825, time =&amp;nbsp;2.57172, matlab =&amp;nbsp;1.9329&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;This seems to be odd.&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;Does mkl perform something special ? any pivoting ? or more specialized for sparser patterns ? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Kyungjoo&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:02:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kim__Kyungjoo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-07T00:02:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Incomplete factorization...</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Incomplete-factorization/m-p/1000704#M18504</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;Hello,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I am testing MKL ilu factorization. As it only works for ilu0, I provide a sparse matrix pattern that corresponds to ilu(k). One thing I observe is that the performance is getting slower when I increase the level of fills (I have compared with matlab for comparison). Is this expected ?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;For instance, I have the following results from mkl.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;level0, nnz = 9,027,150, time =&amp;nbsp;0.598093, matlab =&amp;nbsp;0.766352&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;level1, nnz =&amp;nbsp;12,816,050, time =&amp;nbsp;1.3787, matlab =&amp;nbsp;1.31876&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;level2, nnz = 15,450,825, time =&amp;nbsp;2.57172, matlab =&amp;nbsp;1.9329&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;This seems to be odd.&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;Does mkl perform something special ? any pivoting ? or more specialized for sparser patterns ? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Kyungjoo&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:02:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Incomplete-factorization/m-p/1000704#M18504</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kim__Kyungjoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T00:02:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

