<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hello, in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/cluster-sparse-solver-and-distributed-format/m-p/1036990#M20458</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your report.&amp;nbsp; Our engineer owner could verify this is problem, and they are planning to fix it in our near future release.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
	Chao&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:49:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-09-02T08:49:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>cluster_sparse_solver and distributed format</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/cluster-sparse-solver-and-distributed-format/m-p/1036989#M20457</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to use&amp;nbsp;cluster_sparse_solver and solve a system in-place (iparm(6) = 1), with a distributed format (iparm(40) = 2). I adapted the example&amp;nbsp;cl_solver_unsym_distr_c.c as you can see attached, and at runtime, on two MPI processes, I get the following output:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The solution out-of-place of the system is:&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on zero process x [0] = &amp;nbsp;0.263109 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; rhs [0] = &amp;nbsp;1.000000&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on zero process x [1] = &amp;nbsp;0.305243 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; rhs [1] = &amp;nbsp;1.000000&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on zero process x [2] = -0.347378 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; rhs [2] = &amp;nbsp;0.250000&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The solution out-of-place of the system is:&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on first process x [0] = -0.347378 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;rhs [0] = &amp;nbsp;0.750000&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on first process x [1] = &amp;nbsp;0.205993 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;rhs [1] = &amp;nbsp;1.000000&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on first process x [2] = &amp;nbsp;0.288390 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;rhs [2] = &amp;nbsp;1.000000&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Solving system in-place...&lt;BR /&gt;
	The solution in-place of the system is:&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on zero process x [0] = &amp;nbsp;1.000000&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on zero process x [1] = &amp;nbsp;1.000000&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on zero process x [2] = &amp;nbsp;0.250000&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The solution in-place of the system is:&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on first process x [0] = &amp;nbsp;0.750000&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on first process x [1] = &amp;nbsp;1.000000&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on first process x [2] = &amp;nbsp;1.000000&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Can you reproduce this behavior ? The solution in-place is obviously wrong. Do you see how to fix that ? Thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 07:47:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/cluster-sparse-solver-and-distributed-format/m-p/1036989#M20457</guid>
      <dc:creator>asd__asdqwe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-01T07:47:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/cluster-sparse-solver-and-distributed-format/m-p/1036990#M20458</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your report.&amp;nbsp; Our engineer owner could verify this is problem, and they are planning to fix it in our near future release.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
	Chao&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:49:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/cluster-sparse-solver-and-distributed-format/m-p/1036990#M20458</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-02T08:49:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This problem is fixed and the</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/cluster-sparse-solver-and-distributed-format/m-p/1036991#M20459</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This problem is fixed and the fix would be available into the nearest update 1 - &amp;nbsp;MKL v.11.2. &amp;nbsp;We will make the announcement of this release on the Top of the forum.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/cluster-sparse-solver-and-distributed-format/m-p/1036991#M20459</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gennady_F_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-06T09:09:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I just tried the new version.</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/cluster-sparse-solver-and-distributed-format/m-p/1036992#M20460</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;With the new update, I'm now getting errors that I can't reproduce on a simple program such as:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;*** Error in PARDISO &amp;nbsp;( &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; insufficient_memory) error_num= 10&lt;BR /&gt;
	*** Error in PARDISO memory allocation: SOLVING_ITERREF_WORK_DATA, allocation of 1 bytes failed&lt;BR /&gt;
	total memory wanted here: 159 kbyte&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The thing is that the matrix is really small (36 x 36 on 8 processes), and I'm turning iterative refinement off, so I don't understand why is PARDISO trying to allocate memory, and why it is failing (I have 6 GB of RAM on the machine I'm getting these errors on).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2014 18:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/cluster-sparse-solver-and-distributed-format/m-p/1036992#M20460</guid>
      <dc:creator>asd__asdqwe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-16T18:10:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Here is also the exact test</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/cluster-sparse-solver-and-distributed-format/m-p/1036993#M20461</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here is the exact same test case as above, except this time, the RHS and the solution are centralized while the matrix is distributed. Clearly the problem is still here. Can you reproduce this problem on your side ?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;$ icc -v&lt;BR /&gt;
	icc version 15.0.1 (gcc version 4.9.0 compatibility)&lt;BR /&gt;
	$ mpicc -cc=icc cl_solver_unsym_distr_c.c -lmkl_intel_thread -lmkl_core -lmkl_intel_lp64 -liomp5&lt;BR /&gt;
	$ mpirun -np 2 ./a.out&lt;BR /&gt;
	The solution out-of-place of the system is:&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on zero process x [0] = &amp;nbsp;0.149579 &amp;nbsp; rhs [0] = &amp;nbsp;1.000000&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on zero process x [1] = &amp;nbsp;0.259831 &amp;nbsp; rhs [1] = &amp;nbsp;1.000000&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on zero process x [2] = -0.370084 &amp;nbsp; rhs [2] = &amp;nbsp;0.250000&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on zero process x [3] = &amp;nbsp;0.011236 &amp;nbsp; rhs [3] = &amp;nbsp;1.000000&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on zero process x [4] = &amp;nbsp;0.415730 &amp;nbsp; rhs [4] = &amp;nbsp;1.000000&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Solving system in-place...&lt;BR /&gt;
	The solution in-place of the system is:&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on zero process x [0] = &amp;nbsp;0.149579&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on zero process x [1] = &amp;nbsp;0.259831&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on zero process x [2] = -0.370084&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on zero process x [3] = &amp;nbsp;1.000000&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;on zero process x [4] = &amp;nbsp;1.000000&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2014 18:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/cluster-sparse-solver-and-distributed-format/m-p/1036993#M20461</guid>
      <dc:creator>asd__asdqwe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-16T18:50:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Could you confirm that you</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/cluster-sparse-solver-and-distributed-format/m-p/1036994#M20462</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="line-height: 19.5120010375977px;"&gt;Could you confirm that you can reproduce this new issue please ? The original issue is fixed though. Thank you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 08:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/cluster-sparse-solver-and-distributed-format/m-p/1036994#M20462</guid>
      <dc:creator>asd__asdqwe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-01T08:46:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It has been three weeks since</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/cluster-sparse-solver-and-distributed-format/m-p/1036995#M20463</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It has been three weeks since I posted this new issue, but I still don't have a clear answer, could you please let me know if the problem is on my side ?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 08:21:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/cluster-sparse-solver-and-distributed-format/m-p/1036995#M20463</guid>
      <dc:creator>asd__asdqwe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-08T08:21:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

