<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Did you link with ILP64 in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Parallel-cluster-sparse-direct-solver-on-very-large-matrix/m-p/1057304#M21494</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Did you link with ILP64 libraries?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 04:18:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gennady_F_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-08-20T04:18:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Parallel cluster sparse direct solver on very large matrix</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Parallel-cluster-sparse-direct-solver-on-very-large-matrix/m-p/1057303#M21493</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;Hi there,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We have some C code working for solving a big linear system that is quite sparse using the cluster sparse solver routines in MKL. We generally followed the `cl_solver_unsym_distr_c.c` example code.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;We want to now use this code on an even larger sparse matrix that has over 3 billion non-zero entries (but it is, in fact, sparse). It appears that the cluster sparse solver insists on the number of non-zeros being specified by an MKL_INT, which we are obviously overflowing. Passing in a long instead of an int generates an error. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;Is there a solution to this problem? Are we limited to considering matrices with nnz that is bounded by the maximum size of an integer?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks, Jason&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 22:19:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Parallel-cluster-sparse-direct-solver-on-very-large-matrix/m-p/1057303#M21493</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason_d_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-19T22:19:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Did you link with ILP64</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Parallel-cluster-sparse-direct-solver-on-very-large-matrix/m-p/1057304#M21494</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Did you link with ILP64 libraries?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 04:18:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Parallel-cluster-sparse-direct-solver-on-very-large-matrix/m-p/1057304#M21494</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gennady_F_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-20T04:18:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No, but that solved the</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Parallel-cluster-sparse-direct-solver-on-very-large-matrix/m-p/1057305#M21495</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, but that solved the problem. Thanks, life is better now!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:05:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Parallel-cluster-sparse-direct-solver-on-very-large-matrix/m-p/1057305#M21495</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason_d_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-20T16:05:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

