<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MKL performance w/regard to transform length in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-performance-w-regard-to-transform-length/m-p/1060846#M21687</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;on&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mkl/details" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mkl/details&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The description of MKL perforce states:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;"Fast Fourier Transforms&lt;BR /&gt;
	Intel MKL FFTs include many optimizations and should provide significant performance gains over other libraries ****** for medium and large transform sizes. ******" (emphasis mine).&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;What is the expected value of "medium"? I am comparing performance of MKL FFT against FFTPACK 5.1 and am seeing a break-even value that *I* think is quite large; way bigger than I expected.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;My benchmark includes setup overhead for both MKL and FFTPACK and does a forward/backward transform. The retrieved data series is virtually the same as input.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:23:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mike_p_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-29T15:23:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MKL performance w/regard to transform length</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-performance-w-regard-to-transform-length/m-p/1060846#M21687</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;on&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mkl/details" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mkl/details&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The description of MKL perforce states:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;"Fast Fourier Transforms&lt;BR /&gt;
	Intel MKL FFTs include many optimizations and should provide significant performance gains over other libraries ****** for medium and large transform sizes. ******" (emphasis mine).&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;What is the expected value of "medium"? I am comparing performance of MKL FFT against FFTPACK 5.1 and am seeing a break-even value that *I* think is quite large; way bigger than I expected.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;My benchmark includes setup overhead for both MKL and FFTPACK and does a forward/backward transform. The retrieved data series is virtually the same as input.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:23:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-performance-w-regard-to-transform-length/m-p/1060846#M21687</guid>
      <dc:creator>mike_p_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-29T15:23:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Mike,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-performance-w-regard-to-transform-length/m-p/1060847#M21688</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Mike,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Can you please send us your test results in private message. I will investigate your question and get back to you with update.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Devorah&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 21:42:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-performance-w-regard-to-transform-length/m-p/1060847#M21688</guid>
      <dc:creator>Devorah_H_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-29T21:42:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Mike,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-performance-w-regard-to-transform-length/m-p/1060848#M21689</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Mike,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Performance of MKL FFT is&amp;nbsp;measured without setup overhead.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Medium sizes of a 1D FFT are approximately&amp;nbsp;100...100k. A size becomes 'large' when the working data set does not fit in last level cache, which may vary depending on precision and placement of transform, parallelization, and the computer&amp;nbsp;used.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;
	Dima&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:17:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-performance-w-regard-to-transform-length/m-p/1060848#M21689</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dmitry_B_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-30T13:17:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

