<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PARDISO solve part speed-up problem in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/PARDISO-solve-part-speed-up-problem/m-p/765663#M218</link>
    <description>DearKalinkin&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There are no data issues, &lt;BR /&gt;I mean I just want to know the tips for speed-up.&lt;BR /&gt;For example, you may can say "Use the paramA option".&lt;BR /&gt;So do you know any tips like that?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;B. Hwang&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:51:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bosun_Hwang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-11T05:51:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PARDISO solve part speed-up problem</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/PARDISO-solve-part-speed-up-problem/m-p/765661#M216</link>
      <description>Dear.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've implemented the PARDISO solver into our application.&lt;BR /&gt;The process of our application is two parts.&lt;BR /&gt;One is reorder, factorization,&lt;BR /&gt;and the other one is iterative solve.&lt;BR /&gt;The problem is that the solve speed is not fast&lt;BR /&gt;than I expected. It is almost same as our old solver.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you knowany tips of speed-up for solve part,&lt;BR /&gt;please let me know.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And I wonder whether the solve speed of DSS interface is&lt;BR /&gt;faster thanthat of PARDISO interface?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;B. Hwang</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:17:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/PARDISO-solve-part-speed-up-problem/m-p/765661#M216</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bosun_Hwang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-11T05:17:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PARDISO solve part speed-up problem</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/PARDISO-solve-part-speed-up-problem/m-p/765662#M217</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Could you attach testcase of your problem to find out way to speed-up solve part?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;with best regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Alexander Kalinkin&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:27:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/PARDISO-solve-part-speed-up-problem/m-p/765662#M217</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alexander_K_Intel2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-11T05:27:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PARDISO solve part speed-up problem</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/PARDISO-solve-part-speed-up-problem/m-p/765663#M218</link>
      <description>DearKalinkin&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There are no data issues, &lt;BR /&gt;I mean I just want to know the tips for speed-up.&lt;BR /&gt;For example, you may can say "Use the paramA option".&lt;BR /&gt;So do you know any tips like that?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;B. Hwang&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:51:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/PARDISO-solve-part-speed-up-problem/m-p/765663#M218</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bosun_Hwang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-11T05:51:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PARDISO solve part speed-up problem</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/PARDISO-solve-part-speed-up-problem/m-p/765664#M219</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Each situation is different from another and there are not common advice. If you use solve step several time I could recommendyou to combine several rhs in one vector and run solve step with many rhs. But as I wrote before maybe such advice doesn'tsuitable in your situation.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;With best regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Alexander Kalinkin&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:29:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/PARDISO-solve-part-speed-up-problem/m-p/765664#M219</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alexander_K_Intel2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-11T06:29:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PARDISO solve part speed-up problem</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/PARDISO-solve-part-speed-up-problem/m-p/765665#M220</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;DIV&gt;In MKL 10.3 gold solving step of PARDISO could be run in parallel mode, so you now you could decrease working time on solving step phase.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;With best regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Alexander Kalinkin&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 03:13:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/PARDISO-solve-part-speed-up-problem/m-p/765665#M220</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alexander_K_Intel2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-10T03:13:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

