<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thanks for the link mecej4, in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/LINPACK-interface-to-MKL-LAPACK/m-p/1067770#M22023</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the link mecej4, it is useful. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I'm well aware of the vintage of LINPACK, as I was using it back in the 80's, lol.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Of course, there is still a lot of computational software, such as DAE solvers, benchmarks and the like, that still make extensive use of LINPACK. &amp;nbsp;Fortunately, the LINPACK routines I would like to replace have LAPACK counterparts. &amp;nbsp;I suspect someone else out there has written wrappers for all the LINPACK routines that can be mapped to LAPACK, so I was just scrounging. &amp;nbsp;I have written several myself, but they are sloppy.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 23:34:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>j0e</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-12-29T23:34:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LINPACK interface to MKL/LAPACK</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/LINPACK-interface-to-MKL-LAPACK/m-p/1067768#M22021</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I often use older (and sometime new) fortran code that uses LINPACK, so I often replace those calls to LAPACK equivalent routines so that I may use MKL. &amp;nbsp;I have found that this can improve performance in some cases. This also allows easy use of Intel Phi coprocessors for large problems where offloading is warranted.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I was wondering if there exist a set of wrapper routines that in general will allow LINPACK to be replaced by MKL?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;joe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 19:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/LINPACK-interface-to-MKL-LAPACK/m-p/1067768#M22021</guid>
      <dc:creator>j0e</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-29T19:56:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Linpack was developed in the</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/LINPACK-interface-to-MKL-LAPACK/m-p/1067769#M22022</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Linpack was developed in the 1980s, and was superseded by Lapack, well before Intel became a major compiler vendor. Many Linpack routines do not have an exact Lapack replacement, but here is a guide for doing the conversion:&amp;nbsp;http://www.netlib.org/lapack/lug/node147.html .&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The file&amp;nbsp;http://www.netlib.org/linpack/readme contains the statement&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
	&lt;PRE style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); line-height: normal; word-wrap: break-word; white-space: pre-wrap;"&gt; If you are interested in acquiring the entire LINPACK, it may
 make more sense to talk with NAG. NAG distribute the software
 on a mag tape for a nominal charge.&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;That should give you a good idea of the vintage of Linpack.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 23:22:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/LINPACK-interface-to-MKL-LAPACK/m-p/1067769#M22022</guid>
      <dc:creator>mecej4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-29T23:22:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks for the link mecej4,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/LINPACK-interface-to-MKL-LAPACK/m-p/1067770#M22023</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the link mecej4, it is useful. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I'm well aware of the vintage of LINPACK, as I was using it back in the 80's, lol.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Of course, there is still a lot of computational software, such as DAE solvers, benchmarks and the like, that still make extensive use of LINPACK. &amp;nbsp;Fortunately, the LINPACK routines I would like to replace have LAPACK counterparts. &amp;nbsp;I suspect someone else out there has written wrappers for all the LINPACK routines that can be mapped to LAPACK, so I was just scrounging. &amp;nbsp;I have written several myself, but they are sloppy.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 23:34:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/LINPACK-interface-to-MKL-LAPACK/m-p/1067770#M22023</guid>
      <dc:creator>j0e</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-29T23:34:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Joe, your comments touch upon</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/LINPACK-interface-to-MKL-LAPACK/m-p/1067771#M22024</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Joe, your comments touch upon an issue that has been of some concern. Netlib is not as well maintained as it used to be. Some of the e-mail links of moderators at netlib.sandia.gov are defunct, and it appears doubtful if will remain possible to submit bug reports and have corrections made in a reasonable period. It is a pity, because there is no other single site with the same breadth of coverage of NA topics as Ma Netlib.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 23:54:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/LINPACK-interface-to-MKL-LAPACK/m-p/1067771#M22024</guid>
      <dc:creator>mecej4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-29T23:54:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

