<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Schur with Sparse PARDISO Complex matrix in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Schur-with-Sparse-PARDISO-Complex-matrix/m-p/1080779#M22797</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am using PARDISO to compute a Schur complement &amp;nbsp;matrix. I am testing with real matrix meaning that I am using complex numbers with 0 imaginary parts. When the matrix size is small, the imaginary part of the result is zero but when the size increases, I get a small imaginary part. For example, for a 110000X11000 matrix and a Schur matrix size of about 100x100, the imaginary part is about 1e-6 to 1e-5 smaller than the real part. I would assume the imaginary part should be always 0. I know that numeric error can exist but I would think it is impossible to have anything than 0 by combining zero numbers.Also, a 1e-6 accuracy in double precision does not look that good. &amp;nbsp;Am I wrong? If it is needed I can provide an example. I will need to make a simplified code for that.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Marc&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:19:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>marcsolal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-01-27T19:19:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Schur with Sparse PARDISO Complex matrix</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Schur-with-Sparse-PARDISO-Complex-matrix/m-p/1080779#M22797</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am using PARDISO to compute a Schur complement &amp;nbsp;matrix. I am testing with real matrix meaning that I am using complex numbers with 0 imaginary parts. When the matrix size is small, the imaginary part of the result is zero but when the size increases, I get a small imaginary part. For example, for a 110000X11000 matrix and a Schur matrix size of about 100x100, the imaginary part is about 1e-6 to 1e-5 smaller than the real part. I would assume the imaginary part should be always 0. I know that numeric error can exist but I would think it is impossible to have anything than 0 by combining zero numbers.Also, a 1e-6 accuracy in double precision does not look that good. &amp;nbsp;Am I wrong? If it is needed I can provide an example. I will need to make a simplified code for that.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Marc&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:19:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Schur-with-Sparse-PARDISO-Complex-matrix/m-p/1080779#M22797</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcsolal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-27T19:19:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I am sorry. This was a</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Schur-with-Sparse-PARDISO-Complex-matrix/m-p/1080780#M22798</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am sorry. This was a mistake. I do not know how to remove this post.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Marc&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 00:39:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Schur-with-Sparse-PARDISO-Complex-matrix/m-p/1080780#M22798</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcsolal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-28T00:39:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

