<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Actually, it is the Intel in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Accuracy-performance-of-Intel-Math-Library/m-p/1107027#M24196</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Actually, it is the Intel Math Library described at&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/522653"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/522653&lt;/A&gt; that I am interested in performance figures for.&amp;nbsp; In particular, for the long double functions.&amp;nbsp; (As far as I am aware, the MKL does not contain long double functions.)&amp;nbsp; I am interested in seeing tables for IML similar to the ones given for MKL at &lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/doclib/mkl/vm/functions/_performanceall.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/doclib/mkl/vm/functions/_performanceall.html&lt;/A&gt; .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 21:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Robert_E_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-12-08T21:28:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Accuracy/performance of Intel Math Library</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Accuracy-performance-of-Intel-Math-Library/m-p/1107025#M24194</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you please point me to the accuracy and performance tables for the Intel Math Library described at &lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/522653" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/522653&lt;/A&gt; ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:11:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Accuracy-performance-of-Intel-Math-Library/m-p/1107025#M24194</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert_E_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-06T22:11:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Robert,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Accuracy-performance-of-Intel-Math-Library/m-p/1107026#M24195</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Robert,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The link you mentioned is the &lt;EM&gt;User and Reference Guide&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;of Intel C++ compiler 15. I suppose what you are interested in may be Math Kernel Library (MKL), which is not a part of the compiler. The latest version of MKL is 2017(&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mkl"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mkl&lt;/A&gt;). Also, you may find documentation of MKL &lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mkl/documentation"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regarding to the accuracy and performance table, is &lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mkl/benchmarks"&gt;this&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;(https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mkl/benchmarks) what you want?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 01:25:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Accuracy-performance-of-Intel-Math-Library/m-p/1107026#M24195</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jing_Xu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-08T01:25:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Actually, it is the Intel</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Accuracy-performance-of-Intel-Math-Library/m-p/1107027#M24196</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Actually, it is the Intel Math Library described at&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/522653"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/522653&lt;/A&gt; that I am interested in performance figures for.&amp;nbsp; In particular, for the long double functions.&amp;nbsp; (As far as I am aware, the MKL does not contain long double functions.)&amp;nbsp; I am interested in seeing tables for IML similar to the ones given for MKL at &lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/doclib/mkl/vm/functions/_performanceall.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/doclib/mkl/vm/functions/_performanceall.html&lt;/A&gt; .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 21:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Accuracy-performance-of-Intel-Math-Library/m-p/1107027#M24196</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert_E_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-08T21:28:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Robert,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Accuracy-performance-of-Intel-Math-Library/m-p/1107028#M24197</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Robert,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We do not have performance data published for the math library described at&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/522653"&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0066cc"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/522653" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/522653&lt;/A&gt;. The long double functions (I assume you mean those using the 80-bit double-extended floating-point format) will have lower performance than the 32-bit single precision or 64-bit double precision ones for example, mainly because the latter can take advantage of the existing SIMD instructions (from 128-bit&amp;nbsp;SSE to 512-bit AVX-512, depending on the processor you are using). Performance should still be/is very good for&amp;nbsp;the long double functions, as they&amp;nbsp;are based on native double-extended floating-point operations available in the Intel(r) Architecture x87 FPU (Floating-Point Unit).&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Marius&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:28:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Accuracy-performance-of-Intel-Math-Library/m-p/1107028#M24197</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marius_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-09T00:28:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks for the information,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Accuracy-performance-of-Intel-Math-Library/m-p/1107029#M24198</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the information, Marius.&amp;nbsp; (Yes, you are correct, I did mean 80-bit FP.)&amp;nbsp; Robert&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 16:40:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Accuracy-performance-of-Intel-Math-Library/m-p/1107029#M24198</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert_E_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-09T16:40:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

