<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Check the discussions on  in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-giving-different-results-for-different-argument-alignments/m-p/1110116#M24292</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Check the discussions on&amp;nbsp; this subject on the MKL forum, and consider whether you want to try the conditional numerical reproducibility options.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If you wish to minimize alignment dependencies in your own compiled code, set -fp:source or equivalent VS property.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Aligned results may be slightly more accurate, with differences indicative of the level of accuracy.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-12-16T13:08:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MKL giving different results for different argument alignments</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-giving-different-results-for-different-argument-alignments/m-p/1110113#M24289</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We're seeing DSYEVX in MKL give different results when the A matrix is aligned on a 16-byte boundary or not. &amp;nbsp;A very simple test case is available at&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://github.com/tomkcook/dsyevx_bug"&gt;https://github.com/tomkcook/dsyevx_bug&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We're using the following product versions:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;UL&gt;
	&lt;LI&gt;Microsoft Visual Studio 2013 Version 12.0.40629.00 Update 5&lt;/LI&gt;
	&lt;LI&gt;Intel(R) Visual Fortran Composer XE 2013 SP1 Update 2 Integration for Microsoft Visual Studio* 2013, 14.0.0086.12&lt;/LI&gt;
	&lt;LI&gt;MKL 11.1 Update 2&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We've got some more info on this, but before I waste anyone's time with that, I'd appreciate if someone could confirm this is actually a bug an not just me doing something daft!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:34:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-giving-different-results-for-different-argument-alignments/m-p/1110113#M24289</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tom_C_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-16T09:34:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The source file at Github has</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-giving-different-results-for-different-argument-alignments/m-p/1110114#M24290</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The source file at Github has several lines with over 300 characters. Many compilers cannot handle more than 132 characters per line.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:44:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-giving-different-results-for-different-argument-alignments/m-p/1110114#M24290</guid>
      <dc:creator>mecej4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-16T11:44:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks for the comment, but I</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-giving-different-results-for-different-argument-alignments/m-p/1110115#M24291</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the comment, but I'm fairly confident that's not what's happening here. &amp;nbsp;Even if the lines were being silently truncated, that should cause a compile error as the line-continuation ampersands are at the ends of lines.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:50:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-giving-different-results-for-different-argument-alignments/m-p/1110115#M24291</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tom_C_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-16T11:50:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Check the discussions on </title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-giving-different-results-for-different-argument-alignments/m-p/1110116#M24292</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Check the discussions on&amp;nbsp; this subject on the MKL forum, and consider whether you want to try the conditional numerical reproducibility options.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If you wish to minimize alignment dependencies in your own compiled code, set -fp:source or equivalent VS property.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Aligned results may be slightly more accurate, with differences indicative of the level of accuracy.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-giving-different-results-for-different-argument-alignments/m-p/1110116#M24292</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-16T13:08:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tom, Could you check the</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-giving-different-results-for-different-argument-alignments/m-p/1110117#M24293</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Tom, C&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;ould you check the problem with the latest version of MKL 11.3? &amp;nbsp;This version fully supports unaligned input. But, please take into account - the #of threads should be the same from run to run.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:48:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/MKL-giving-different-results-for-different-argument-alignments/m-p/1110117#M24293</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gennady_F_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-16T18:48:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

