<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Can I get the exactly layout of dnnLayout_t? aka NCHW / NHWC in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Can-I-get-the-exactly-layout-of-dnnLayout-t-aka-NCHW-NHWC/m-p/1125181#M25195</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If I could do this, I would be able to avoid conversion between layers. I have done some experiment, if no conversion, my application will be faster 10%&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 07:04:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>xuesong_g_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-15T07:04:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Can I get the exactly layout of dnnLayout_t? aka NCHW / NHWC</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Can-I-get-the-exactly-layout-of-dnnLayout-t-aka-NCHW-NHWC/m-p/1125181#M25195</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If I could do this, I would be able to avoid conversion between layers. I have done some experiment, if no conversion, my application will be faster 10%&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 07:04:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Can-I-get-the-exactly-layout-of-dnnLayout-t-aka-NCHW-NHWC/m-p/1125181#M25195</guid>
      <dc:creator>xuesong_g_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-15T07:04:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

