<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic feast max-residual does not decrease in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/feast-max-residual-does-not-decrease/m-p/1128027#M25397</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've observed a strange behavior with the feast algorithm for the generalized eigenvalue problem. When calling the dfeast_scsrgv function (2019.5.281 for Windows), the process of refinement doesn't seem&amp;nbsp;to increase convergence. Here is an extract of the console output :&amp;nbsp;&lt;IMG alt="" src="C:\Data\Projets\mkl\contact\screenshot.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE class="brush:bash; class-name:dark;"&gt;Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers: double precision driver
Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers: List of input parameters fpm(1:64)-- if different from default
Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers: fpm(1)=1
Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers: fpm(3)=13
Search interval [0.000000000000000e+00;1.233823920191183e+04]
Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers: Size subspace 181
#Loop | #Eig  |    Trace     | Error-Trace |  Max-Residual
Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers: Resize subspace 172
0,110,5.663706373860352e+05,1.000000000000000e+00,1.490862471060101e+00
Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers: Resize subspace 159
1,109,5.593806163510049e+05,5.665331106522180e-01,6.012806440118748e-11
2,109,5.593806163510234e+05,1.500216997544874e-12,2.104345640080324e-12
3,109,5.593806163510176e+05,4.717663514292057e-13,2.397189370464081e-12
4,109,5.593806163510182e+05,4.717663514292057e-14,2.411177358610362e-12
5,109,5.593806163509969e+05,1.726664846230893e-12,2.328835176790949e-12
6,109,5.593806163510114e+05,1.179415878573014e-12,2.524976500464305e-12
7,109,5.593806163510105e+05,7.548261622867291e-14,2.428905555332923e-12
8,109,5.593806163509984e+05,9.812740109727479e-13,2.286805079042987e-12
9,109,5.593806163510138e+05,1.245463167773103e-12,2.406761270890775e-12
10,109,5.593806163510316e+05,1.443605035373369e-12,2.361847027304253e-12
11,109,5.593806163510248e+05,5.472489676578786e-13,1.911120870967018e-12
12,109,5.593806163510073e+05,1.424734381316201e-12,2.362358223946872e-12
13,109,5.593806163510157e+05,6.887788730866403e-13,2.098377232081009e-12
14,109,5.593806163509990e+05,1.358687092116112e-12,2.354940403574139e-12
15,109,5.593806163510053e+05,5.095076595435422e-13,2.130778830695237e-12
16,109,5.593806163510152e+05,8.020027974296497e-13,2.378453239753553e-12
17,109,5.593806163510276e+05,1.009579992058500e-12,2.479238742295124e-12
18,109,5.593806163510045e+05,1.877630078688239e-12,2.416088631528979e-12
19,109,5.593806163510167e+05,9.907093380013320e-13,2.507773079026495e-12
20,109,5.593806163509991e+05,1.424734381316201e-12,2.167436545143697e-12
Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers have successfully converged (to desired tolerance).
Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers have successfully converged (to desired tolerance).&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We can observe that the Max-Residual values stops to decrease after the third loop.&amp;nbsp;I would like to know if this behavior is the one that I should expect or if there might be something wrong with my call or&amp;nbsp;with the matrices (I've checked the correctness of the matrices by setting&amp;nbsp;fpm(27)=1 and fpm(28)=1). Based on the documentation, I thought that&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) each refinement loop would increase&amp;nbsp;the precision.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) the algorithm would give a feedback to warn me that the algorithm didn't converge to the expected values info=2&amp;nbsp;(https://software.intel.com/en-us/mkl-developer-reference-fortran-extended-eigensolver-output-details#GUID-E1DB444D-B362-4DBF-A1DF-DA68F7FB7019)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've observed the same behavior of non-increasing precision and no feedback&amp;nbsp;with different pairs of matrices (although there are all coming from the same domain).&amp;nbsp;I tried to increase the number of contour points to the maximum and change the value of m0, but with no success.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if you need more information.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Martin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:37:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anderegg__Martin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-10-23T12:37:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>feast max-residual does not decrease</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/feast-max-residual-does-not-decrease/m-p/1128027#M25397</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've observed a strange behavior with the feast algorithm for the generalized eigenvalue problem. When calling the dfeast_scsrgv function (2019.5.281 for Windows), the process of refinement doesn't seem&amp;nbsp;to increase convergence. Here is an extract of the console output :&amp;nbsp;&lt;IMG alt="" src="C:\Data\Projets\mkl\contact\screenshot.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE class="brush:bash; class-name:dark;"&gt;Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers: double precision driver
Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers: List of input parameters fpm(1:64)-- if different from default
Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers: fpm(1)=1
Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers: fpm(3)=13
Search interval [0.000000000000000e+00;1.233823920191183e+04]
Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers: Size subspace 181
#Loop | #Eig  |    Trace     | Error-Trace |  Max-Residual
Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers: Resize subspace 172
0,110,5.663706373860352e+05,1.000000000000000e+00,1.490862471060101e+00
Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers: Resize subspace 159
1,109,5.593806163510049e+05,5.665331106522180e-01,6.012806440118748e-11
2,109,5.593806163510234e+05,1.500216997544874e-12,2.104345640080324e-12
3,109,5.593806163510176e+05,4.717663514292057e-13,2.397189370464081e-12
4,109,5.593806163510182e+05,4.717663514292057e-14,2.411177358610362e-12
5,109,5.593806163509969e+05,1.726664846230893e-12,2.328835176790949e-12
6,109,5.593806163510114e+05,1.179415878573014e-12,2.524976500464305e-12
7,109,5.593806163510105e+05,7.548261622867291e-14,2.428905555332923e-12
8,109,5.593806163509984e+05,9.812740109727479e-13,2.286805079042987e-12
9,109,5.593806163510138e+05,1.245463167773103e-12,2.406761270890775e-12
10,109,5.593806163510316e+05,1.443605035373369e-12,2.361847027304253e-12
11,109,5.593806163510248e+05,5.472489676578786e-13,1.911120870967018e-12
12,109,5.593806163510073e+05,1.424734381316201e-12,2.362358223946872e-12
13,109,5.593806163510157e+05,6.887788730866403e-13,2.098377232081009e-12
14,109,5.593806163509990e+05,1.358687092116112e-12,2.354940403574139e-12
15,109,5.593806163510053e+05,5.095076595435422e-13,2.130778830695237e-12
16,109,5.593806163510152e+05,8.020027974296497e-13,2.378453239753553e-12
17,109,5.593806163510276e+05,1.009579992058500e-12,2.479238742295124e-12
18,109,5.593806163510045e+05,1.877630078688239e-12,2.416088631528979e-12
19,109,5.593806163510167e+05,9.907093380013320e-13,2.507773079026495e-12
20,109,5.593806163509991e+05,1.424734381316201e-12,2.167436545143697e-12
Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers have successfully converged (to desired tolerance).
Intel MKL Extended Eigensolvers have successfully converged (to desired tolerance).&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We can observe that the Max-Residual values stops to decrease after the third loop.&amp;nbsp;I would like to know if this behavior is the one that I should expect or if there might be something wrong with my call or&amp;nbsp;with the matrices (I've checked the correctness of the matrices by setting&amp;nbsp;fpm(27)=1 and fpm(28)=1). Based on the documentation, I thought that&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) each refinement loop would increase&amp;nbsp;the precision.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) the algorithm would give a feedback to warn me that the algorithm didn't converge to the expected values info=2&amp;nbsp;(https://software.intel.com/en-us/mkl-developer-reference-fortran-extended-eigensolver-output-details#GUID-E1DB444D-B362-4DBF-A1DF-DA68F7FB7019)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've observed the same behavior of non-increasing precision and no feedback&amp;nbsp;with different pairs of matrices (although there are all coming from the same domain).&amp;nbsp;I tried to increase the number of contour points to the maximum and change the value of m0, but with no success.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if you need more information.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Martin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:37:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/feast-max-residual-does-not-decrease/m-p/1128027#M25397</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anderegg__Martin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-23T12:37:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

