https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Difference-Intel-Fortran-V-11-versus-Intel-Fortran-XE-Error-8284/m-p/795177#M2625 The new compiler does a better job of checking for consistency of arguments, if you specify the /warn option. <BR /><BR />In the case of NLPQL and its variants, the function value F is sometimes a scalar, sometimes an array of size 1. Strictly speaking, this is an error, but one that has no adverse effect with most compilers.<BR /><BR />Either do not use the /warn option when you compile, or change F to F(1) in the declarations and expressions that contain the variable F.<BR /> Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:33:29 GMT mecej4 2011-11-10T18:33:29Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Difference-Intel-Fortran-V-11-versus-Intel-Fortran-XE-Error-8284/m-p/795176#M2624 Hi,<DIV></DIV><DIV>I am using the<SPAN style="line-height: 16px;">NLPQLY and</SPAN><SPAN style="line-height: 16px;">NLPQLP from herehttp://www.ai7.uni-bayreuth.de/nlpqly.htm.</SPAN><DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV></DIV><DIV><SPAN style="line-height: 16px;"><BR /></SPAN></DIV><DIV><SPAN style="line-height: 16px;">When I am running the program on my MAC Intel Fortran V.11. everything is fine, no problem.</SPAN></DIV><DIV><SPAN style="line-height: 16px;"><BR /></SPAN></DIV><DIV><SPAN style="line-height: 16px;">However, when I am running the program on Windows Intel Fortran XE I get the following error message:</SPAN></DIV><DIV><SPAN style="line-height: 16px;"><BR /></SPAN></DIV><DIV><SPAN style="line-height: 16px;"><DIV id="_mcePaste">Error 1 error #8284: If the actual argument is scalar, the dummy argument shall be scalar unless the actual argument is of type character or is an element of an array that is not assumed shape, pointer, or polymorphic.</DIV><DIV id="_mcePaste"></DIV><DIV id="_mcePaste">Is there anything I missed in my compiler configuration, did the compiler change or do you know of any other potential problem?</DIV><DIV id="_mcePaste"></DIV><DIV id="_mcePaste">I have no clue...</DIV><DIV id="_mcePaste"></DIV><DIV id="_mcePaste">Best,</DIV><DIV id="_mcePaste">steingre</DIV></SPAN></DIV> Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:12:24 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Difference-Intel-Fortran-V-11-versus-Intel-Fortran-XE-Error-8284/m-p/795176#M2624 steingre 2011-11-10T17:12:24Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Difference-Intel-Fortran-V-11-versus-Intel-Fortran-XE-Error-8284/m-p/795177#M2625 The new compiler does a better job of checking for consistency of arguments, if you specify the /warn option. <BR /><BR />In the case of NLPQL and its variants, the function value F is sometimes a scalar, sometimes an array of size 1. Strictly speaking, this is an error, but one that has no adverse effect with most compilers.<BR /><BR />Either do not use the /warn option when you compile, or change F to F(1) in the declarations and expressions that contain the variable F.<BR /> Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:33:29 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Difference-Intel-Fortran-V-11-versus-Intel-Fortran-XE-Error-8284/m-p/795177#M2625 mecej4 2011-11-10T18:33:29Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Difference-Intel-Fortran-V-11-versus-Intel-Fortran-XE-Error-8284/m-p/795178#M2626 Thank you very much! It works now!<DIV></DIV><DIV>Best,</DIV><DIV>Steingre</DIV> Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:21:07 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Difference-Intel-Fortran-V-11-versus-Intel-Fortran-XE-Error-8284/m-p/795178#M2626 steingre 2011-11-10T19:21:07Z