<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Why does the mkl fft routine return unreasonably large number? in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Why-does-the-mkl-fft-routine-return-unreasonably-large-number/m-p/795447#M2636</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please send us small testcase to analyze your problem together with information: MKL-version, architecture, OS, etc.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:49:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>barragan_villanueva_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-02T14:49:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why does the mkl fft routine return unreasonably large number?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Why-does-the-mkl-fft-routine-return-unreasonably-large-number/m-p/795446#M2635</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The code is like this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Status = DftiCreateDescriptor(FFT_Handle32, DFTI_DOUBLE, DFTI_REAL, 1, k32+1)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Status = DftiCommitDescriptor(FFT_Handle32)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Status = DftiComputeBackward(FFT_Handle32, temptv32)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;End do&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have initialized the FFT_Handle32, and run the loop for many times for different arrays temptv32. One of the arrays has exactly zero, but the backward FFT routine returns numbers like 6.187317420301585E+195. Why is that? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Why-does-the-mkl-fft-routine-return-unreasonably-large-number/m-p/795446#M2635</guid>
      <dc:creator>hadesmajesty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-02T13:16:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why does the mkl fft routine return unreasonably large number?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Why-does-the-mkl-fft-routine-return-unreasonably-large-number/m-p/795447#M2636</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please send us small testcase to analyze your problem together with information: MKL-version, architecture, OS, etc.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:49:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Why-does-the-mkl-fft-routine-return-unreasonably-large-number/m-p/795447#M2636</guid>
      <dc:creator>barragan_villanueva_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-02T14:49:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why does the mkl fft routine return unreasonably large number?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Why-does-the-mkl-fft-routine-return-unreasonably-large-number/m-p/795448#M2637</link>
      <description>Hellohadesmajesty,&lt;DIV&gt;how about the test case for reproducing the problem? The existing cases don't show the problem on our side.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;--Gennady&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:55:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Why-does-the-mkl-fft-routine-return-unreasonably-large-number/m-p/795448#M2637</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gennady_F_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-14T08:55:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

