<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi Pham, in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-is-much-slower-than-Multi-frontal-Solver/m-p/1144521#M26583</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Pham,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;To your problem, I have few questions would like to check with you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;OL&gt;
	&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Did you use OOC &amp;nbsp;mode for PARDISO ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
	&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;I found the num of equation is different from Anasys (980973) that PARDISO is 1007570, there almost 20k difference between two solvers, are you sure you are using totally same input matrix?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
	&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Would you mind share your iparm setting and input matrix to us through private message? Thanks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
	Fiona&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 08:35:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zhen_Z_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-11T08:35:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pardiso is much slower than Multi frontal Solver</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-is-much-slower-than-Multi-frontal-Solver/m-p/1144520#M26582</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hallo&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em;"&gt;I use Pardiso for solving Matrix which comes from full coupled 3D Biot's equation. For small problem, Pardiso has no problem. However, when size of matrix increases, the problem appears.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em;"&gt;Currently, the matrix is around 1e6 x 1e6 (1 mil x 1 mil), and nnz=77589160 (around 77.5 mil). Phase 1 (reordering with iparm(2)=3 does not take too much time, however Phase 2 - Factorization takes so long to finish. In my case, with core i7 - 6800k and 64GB Ram, it took around 10 mins for Phase 2.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I noticed that the CPU ran only single core. I did some research on Intel forum and found that, the reason came from fill-in process. Then, I tried to compare with Direct Solver of Ansys, which I believe that is Multifrontal solver. Because the finite element mesh was exported from Ansys, so the matrix size is exactly the same. Ansys needed only 64 seconds for everything. Here is log from Ansys.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" src="http://sv1.upsieutoc.com/2017/07/11/ansys.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Here is the log from Pardiso. Pardiso ran single thread, used more memory than Ansys, and much slower. Ansys also used Metis as reordering method. According to &lt;A href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267200189_High_Performance_Computing_of_Three-Dimensional_Finite_Element_Codes_on_a_64-bit_Machine"&gt;this article&lt;/A&gt;, Pardiso should be as fast as multifrontal solver. So what is the wrong thing here? What did I wrongly config?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" src="http://sv1.upsieutoc.com/2017/07/11/pardiso.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;--------------------&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em;"&gt;Pham Hung&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:46:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-is-much-slower-than-Multi-frontal-Solver/m-p/1144520#M26582</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tien_Hung_P_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-10T22:46:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Pham,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-is-much-slower-than-Multi-frontal-Solver/m-p/1144521#M26583</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Pham,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;To your problem, I have few questions would like to check with you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;OL&gt;
	&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Did you use OOC &amp;nbsp;mode for PARDISO ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
	&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;I found the num of equation is different from Anasys (980973) that PARDISO is 1007570, there almost 20k difference between two solvers, are you sure you are using totally same input matrix?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
	&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Would you mind share your iparm setting and input matrix to us through private message? Thanks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
	Fiona&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 08:35:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-is-much-slower-than-Multi-frontal-Solver/m-p/1144521#M26583</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zhen_Z_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-11T08:35:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Fiona,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-is-much-slower-than-Multi-frontal-Solver/m-p/1144522#M26584</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Fiona,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank you a lot for your reply&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;1. The different between number of equations because of constraint boundary conditions. I pretty sure they are the same because I use mesh from Ansys.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em;"&gt;2.I use in-core mode, here is my setting for iparm (default is zero)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em;"&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" src="http://sv1.upsieutoc.com/2017/07/11/ipar.png" /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;3. You could download my matrix &lt;A href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B68r2f2I1sqebm9ScXRfc3Rackk/view?usp=sharing"&gt;from here&lt;/A&gt;. There are 4 txt files (ia.txt, ja.txt, a.txt, rhs.txt) is row index , col index, &amp;nbsp;value, and right hand side vector.&lt;BR /&gt;
	&lt;BR /&gt;
	Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Pham Hung&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:58:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-is-much-slower-than-Multi-frontal-Solver/m-p/1144522#M26584</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tien_Hung_P_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-11T10:58:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hallo again,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-is-much-slower-than-Multi-frontal-Solver/m-p/1144523#M26585</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hallo again,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I tried my problem in Linux (Ubuntu), and Pardiso used all 6 cores for Factorization step. That's really strange.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:35:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-is-much-slower-than-Multi-frontal-Solver/m-p/1144523#M26585</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tien_Hung_P_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-12T09:35:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

