https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/omp-set-num-threads-vs-mkl-set-num-threads/m-p/1152988#M27293 <P>Hi,</P> <P>You could use omp or mkl for threading control, but the mkl has a higher priority. I do not clear what kind of problem you are facing. But we recommend to use mkl_set_num_threads() to set. Thanks.</P> <P>Best regards,<BR /> Fiona</P> Tue, 25 Jul 2017 02:59:15 GMT Zhen_Z_Intel 2017-07-25T02:59:15Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/omp-set-num-threads-vs-mkl-set-num-threads/m-p/1152987#M27292 <P>According MKL documentation, omp_set_num_threads is enough to define the num of threads used by MKL. But that's not the case: I have to use mkl_set_num_threads.</P> Mon, 24 Jul 2017 17:17:10 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/omp-set-num-threads-vs-mkl-set-num-threads/m-p/1152987#M27292 xian-zhong_guous_cd- 2017-07-24T17:17:10Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/omp-set-num-threads-vs-mkl-set-num-threads/m-p/1152988#M27293 <P>Hi,</P> <P>You could use omp or mkl for threading control, but the mkl has a higher priority. I do not clear what kind of problem you are facing. But we recommend to use mkl_set_num_threads() to set. Thanks.</P> <P>Best regards,<BR /> Fiona</P> Tue, 25 Jul 2017 02:59:15 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/omp-set-num-threads-vs-mkl-set-num-threads/m-p/1152988#M27293 Zhen_Z_Intel 2017-07-25T02:59:15Z